1.
Wellington JJ. Educational Research: Contemporary Issues and Practical Approaches. Bloomsbury Academic; 2020. https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/book/educational-research-contemporary-issues-and-practical-approaches/
2.
Matthews B, Ross L. Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
3.
Sage Research Methods online resource (via the library). http://methods.sagepub.com/
4.
Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. SAGE Publications; 2014.
5.
Clough P, Nutbrown C. A Student’s Guide to Methodology: Justifying Enquiry. 2nd ed. Sage; 2007.
6.
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research Methods in Education. 7th ed. Routledge; 2011.
7.
Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed., International student ed. Sage Publications; 2018.
8.
Crotty M. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Sage; 1998.
9.
Denscombe M. The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects. 4th ed. Open University Press; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3017227
10.
Punch K, Oancea A. Introduction to Research Methods in Education. Second edition. SAGE; 2014. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNDczOTA5MjA1L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLnhsaW5rLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
11.
Smith JA, ed. Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. 3rd edition. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2015.
12.
International Journal of Research & Method in Education. https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cwse20
13.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/command/detail?vid=0&sid=984b1532-bfde-4402-a118-d1b8dfd18f44%40sessionmgr104&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#jid=9EB&db=bth
14.
Miller RL, Brewer JD. The A-Z of Social Research: A Dictionary of Key Social Science Research Concepts. Sage; 2003.
15.
Braun V, Clarke V. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. SAGE; 2013.
16.
Coolican H. Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology. 5th ed. Hodder Education; 2009.
17.
Field AP. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th edition. SAGE; 2018. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNTI2NDIyOTY1L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
18.
Mason J. Qualitative Researching. Third edition. Sage; 2018.
19.
Yin RK. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sixth edition. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2018.
20.
Matthews B, Ross L. Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
21.
McKeown S, Williams A, Pauker K. Stories that move them: Changing children’s behaviour toward diverse peers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2017;27(5):381-387. doi:10.1002/casp.2316
22.
Rose J. Dilemmas of Inter-Professional Collaboration: Can they be Resolved? Children & Society. 2011;25(2):151-163. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00268.x
23.
Paulson J, Bellino MJ. Truth commissions, education, and positive peace: an analysis of truth commission final reports (1980–2015). Comparative Education. 2017;53(3):351-378. doi:10.1080/03050068.2017.1334428
24.
Olmedo A. Something old, not much new, and a lot borrowed: philanthropy, business, and the changing roles of government in global education policy networks. Oxford Review of Education. 2017;43(1):69-87. doi:10.1080/03054985.2016.1259104
25.
Yates L. What Does Good Education Research Look like?: Situating a Field and Its Practices. Open University Press; 2004.
26.
Edwards A. Responsible Research: Ways of being a researcher. British Educational Research Journal. 2002;28(2):157-168. doi:10.1080/01411920120122121
27.
Frankham J, Howes A. Talk as action in ‘collaborative action research’: making and taking apart teacher/researcher relationships. British Educational Research Journal. 2006;32(4):617-632. doi:10.1080/01411920600775324
28.
Sanderson I. Is it ‘what works’ that matters? Evaluation and evidence‐based policy‐making. Research Papers in Education. 2003;18(4):331-345. doi:10.1080/0267152032000176846
29.
Cheruvelil KS, Soranno PA, Weathers KC, et al. Creating and maintaining high-performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2014;12(1):31-38. doi:10.1890/130001
30.
Christie D, Cassidy C, Skinner D, et al. Building collaborative communities of enquiry in educational research. Educational Research and Evaluation. 2007;13(3):263-278. doi:10.1080/13803610701632091
31.
Leibowitz, Brenda. ‘It’s an amazing learning curve to be part of the project’: exploring academic identity in collaborative research. Studies in Higher Education. 39(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.801424
32.
Nicolson M, Uematsu K. Collaborative learning, face-to-face or virtual: the advantages of a blended learning approach in an intercultural research group. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2013;36(3):268-278. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2013.819324
33.
Paulus TM, Woodside M, Ziegler MF. "I Tell You, It’s a Journey, Isn’t It?” Understanding Collaborative Meaning Making in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2010;16(10):852-862. doi:10.1177/1077800410383124
34.
Pryor J, Kuupole A, Kutor N, Dunne M, Adu‐Yeboah C. Exploring the fault lines of cross‐cultural collaborative research. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 2009;39(6):769-782. doi:10.1080/03057920903220130
35.
Scager K, Boonstra J, Peeters T, Vulperhorst J, Wiegant F. Collaborative Learning in Higher Education: Evoking Positive Interdependence. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2016;15(4). doi:10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219
36.
Matthews B, Ross L. Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
37.
Dale A, Mason J. Understanding Social Research: Thinking Creatively about Method. SAGE; 2011.
38.
Pring R. Philosophy of Educational Research. Second edition. Bloomsbury Academic; 2015.
39.
Mason J. Chapter 1: Creative tensions in social research. In: Understanding Social Research: Thinking Creatively about Method. SAGE; 2011. https://methods-sagepub-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/book/understanding-social-research
40.
Bridges, David. Philosophy and Educational Research: A Reconsideration of Epistemological Boundaries. Cambridge Journal of Education. 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764970270202
41.
Bryman A. The Debate about Quantitative and Qualitative Research: A Question of Method or Epistemology? The British Journal of Sociology. 1984;35(1). doi:10.2307/590553
42.
Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research. 2006;6(1):97-113. doi:10.1177/1468794106058877
43.
Making connections: The relationship between epistemology and research methods. https://groups.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/Darlaston-Jones_19(1).pdf
44.
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
45.
Brownhill S, Ungarova T, Bipazhanova A. ‘Jumping the first hurdle’: Framing action research questions using the Ice Cream Cone Model. Methodological Innovations. 2017;10(3). doi:10.1177/2059799117741407
46.
Pring R. Philosophy of Educational Research. Third edition. Bloomsbury Academic; 2015.
47.
McKeown S, Williams A, Pauker K. Stories that move them: Changing children’s behaviour toward diverse peers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2017;27(5):381-387. doi:10.1002/casp.2316
48.
Rose J. Dilemmas of Inter-Professional Collaboration: Can they be Resolved? Children & Society. 2011;25(2):151-163. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00268.x
49.
Olmedo A. Something old, not much new, and a lot borrowed: philanthropy, business, and the changing roles of government in global education policy networks. Oxford Review of Education. 2017;43(1):69-87. doi:10.1080/03054985.2016.1259104
50.
Paulson J, Bellino MJ. Truth commissions, education, and positive peace: an analysis of truth commission final reports (1980–2015). Comparative Education. 2017;53(3):351-378. doi:10.1080/03050068.2017.1334428
51.
Blaikie N. Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation. 2nd ed. Polity Press; 2010.
52.
Denscombe M, dawsonera. The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects. 4th ed. Open University Press; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3017227
53.
Greene JC. The generative potential of mixed methods inquiry. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2005;28(2):207-211. doi:10.1080/01406720500256293
54.
Johnson, R. Burke. Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher. 33(7). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3102/0013189X033007014
55.
Luttrell W. Crossing anxious borders: teaching across the quantitative–qualitative ‘divide’. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2005;28(2):183-195. doi:10.1080/01406720500256251
56.
Simons H, Kushner S, Jones K, James D. From evidence‐based practice to practice‐based evidence: the idea of situated generalisation. Research Papers in Education. 2003;18(4):347-364. doi:10.1080/0267152032000176855
57.
Updated: A re-replication of a psychological classic provides a cautionary tale about overhyped science – Research Digest. https://digest.bps.org.uk/2018/08/15/a-re-replication-of-a-psychological-classic-provides-a-cautionary-tale-about-overhyped-science/#more-34535
58.
Yin RK. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sixth edition. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2018.
59.
Tracy, S.J. (2010) Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big tent’ criterial for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851. https://www.sarahjtracy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Tracy-QI-Qualitative-Quality-8-big-tent-criteria.pdf
60.
Blaikie N. Chapter 2: Designing Social Research. In: Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation. 2nd ed. Polity Press; 2010.
61.
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
62.
Bourke R, Loveridge J. Exploring informed consent and dissent through children’s participation in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2014;37(2):151-165. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2013.817551
63.
Floyd A, Arthur L. Researching from within: external and internal ethical engagement. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2012;35(2):171-180. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2012.670481
64.
Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. https://bera.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b8740e3b8965b5fbdcd439462&id=a6fcb74be6&e=86da3cb8e5
65.
Cowan J. Research methods in education - By Louis Cohen et al. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2011;42(5):E110-E110. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01222.x
66.
David, Miriam. Children and School‐based Research: ‘informed consent’ or ‘educated consent’? British Educational Research Journal. 27(3). https://www.jstor.org/stable/1501900?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
67.
DePalma R. Socially just research for social justice: negotiating consent and safety in a participatory action research project. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2010;33(3):215-227. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2010.511713
68.
Gallagher M, Haywood SL, Jones MW, Milne S. Negotiating Informed Consent with Children in School-Based Research: A Critical Review. Children & Society. 2010;24(6):471-482. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00240.x
69.
Guillemin M, Gillam L. Ethics, Reflexivity, and "Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2004;10(2):261-280. doi:10.1177/1077800403262360
70.
Heath S, Charles V, Crow G, Wiles R. Informed consent, gatekeepers and go‐betweens: negotiating consent in child‐ and youth‐orientated institutions. British Educational Research Journal. 2007;33(3):403-417. doi:10.1080/01411920701243651
71.
Honan E, Hamid MO, Alhamdan B, Phommalangsy P, Lingard B. Ethical issues in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2013;36(4):386-399. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2012.705275
72.
James N, Busher H. Ethical issues in online educational research: protecting privacy, establishing authenticity in email interviewing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2007;30(1):101-113. doi:10.1080/17437270701207868
73.
Kidger J. Measuring effectiveness in school sex education—methodological dilemmas in researching an intervention involving young mothers. British Educational Research Journal. 2006;32(2):291-305. doi:10.1080/01411920600569230
74.
Maguire, Lisa K. Respecting and Fulfilling the Right of Post-Primary Pupils to Consent to Participate in Trials and Evaluative Research: A Discussion Paper. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 41(1). doi:b>10.1080/1743727X.2016.1200028
75.
McNess E, Arthur L, Crossley M. ‘Ethnographic dazzle’ and the construction of the ‘Other’: revisiting dimensions of insider and outsider research for international and comparative education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 2015;45(2):295-316. doi:10.1080/03057925.2013.854616
76.
O’Neill J. One chairperson’s experience of ethical review: balancing principle, convention, relationship and risk in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2010;33(3):229-243. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2010.511715
77.
Degabriele Pace G. Doing close-relative research: sticking points, method and ethical considerations. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2015;38(4):341-356. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2014.928685
78.
Pope CC, De Luca R, Tolich M. How an exchange of perspectives led to tentative ethical guidelines for visual ethnography. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2010;33(3):301-315. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2010.511712
79.
Wiles R, Coffey A, Robinson J, Heath S. Anonymisation and visual images: issues of respect, ‘voice’ and protection. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2012;15(1):41-53. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.564423
80.
Yee WC, Andrews J. Professional researcher or a ‘good guest’? Ethical dilemmas involved in researching children and families in the home setting. Educational Review. 2006;58(4):397-413. doi:10.1080/00131910600971859
81.
British Psychological Society (2014) Code of Human Research Ethics (2nd Edition). Leicester, UK: BPS. https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/bps.org.uk/files/Policy%20-%20Files/BPS%20Code%20of%20Human%20Research%20Ethics.pdf
82.
Katyal KR. Gate-keeping and the ambiguities in the nature of ‘informed consent’ in Confucian societies. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2011;34(2):147-159. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2011.578823
83.
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
84.
How many qualitative interviews is enough. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/
85.
Forgasz H, Tan H, Leder G, McLeod A. Enhancing survey participation: Facebook advertisements for recruitment in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2018;41(3):257-270. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2017.1295939
86.
The potentials and pitfalls of using Skype for qualitative (longitudinal) interviews. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3757/
87.
Matthews B, Ross L. Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
88.
Bold C. Using Narrative in Research. SAGE; 2012.
89.
Cormier G. The language variable in educational research: an exploration of researcher positionality, translation, and interpretation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2018;41(3):328-341. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2017.1307335
90.
Domingo M. Development of methodologies for researching online: the case of food blogs. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3704/4/food_blogs.pdf
91.
An Introduction to Using Video for Research. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2259/
92.
Mason J. Qualitative Researching. Third edition. Sage; 2018.
93.
O’Boyle A. Encounters with identity: reflexivity and positioning in an interdisciplinary research project. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2018;41(3):353-366. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2017.1310835
94.
Parker, Andrew. Focus Group Method And Methodology: Current Practice And Recent Debate. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01406720500537304
95.
Porter J. Be careful how you ask! Using focus groups and nominal group technique to explore the barriers to learning. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2013;36(1):33-51. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2012.675554
96.
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
97.
Thematic analysis - an introduction - YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zFcC10vOVY&feature=youtu.be
98.
Wellington JJ. Educational Research: Contemporary Issues and Practical Approaches. Bloomsbury Academic; 2015. https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/book/educational-research-contemporary-issues-and-practical-approaches/
99.
Bazeley P, Jackson K. Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. Second edition. SAGE; 2014.
100.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
101.
Field AP. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th edition. SAGE; 2018. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNTI2NDIyOTY1L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
102.
Mavers, D (2012) Transcribing Video. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2877/4/NCRM_working_paper0512.pdf
103.
Saldaña J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2013.
104.
Foster L, Diamond I, Jefferies J, Diamond I. Beginning Statistics: An Introduction for Social Scientists. Second edition. SAGE; 2015.
105.
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
106.
White P. Chapter 5: Answering research questions: claims, evidence and warrant. In: Developing Research Questions: A Guide for Social Scientists. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=6234682
107.
Wellington JJ. Educational Research: Contemporary Issues and Practical Approaches. Bloomsbury Academic; 2015. https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/book/educational-research-contemporary-issues-and-practical-approaches/
108.
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
109.
Braun V, Clarke V. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. SAGE; 2013.
110.
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
111.
Coleman M, Briggs ARJ. Research Methods in Educational Leadership and Management. Paul Chapman; 2002.
112.
Punch K. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Third edition. Sage; 2014.
113.
Field AP. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th edition. SAGE; 2018. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNTI2NDIyOTY1L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
114.
MacInnes J. An Introduction to Secondary Data Analysis with IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE; 2017.
115.
Salkind NJ. Statistics for People Who (Think They) Hate Statistics. 5 edition. SAGE; 2014.
116.
Free Statistics Book. http://onlinestatbook.com/
117.
Online course | Centre for Multilevel Modelling | University of Bristol. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/learning/online-course/
118.
HyperStat Online: An Introductory Statistics Textbook and Discussion of whether most published research is false. http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/
119.
Discovering Statistics – The adventure begins …. https://www.discoveringstatistics.com/
120.
Open Learning - OpenLearn - Open University. http://www.open.edu/openlearn/
121.
IDRE Stats – Statistical Consulting Web Resources. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/
122.
Statistics Shell. http://www.discoveringstatistics.com/docs/revisespss.pdf
123.
SPSS On-Line Training Workshop. http://calcnet.mth.cmich.edu/org/spss/toc.htm
124.
Free Excel Tutorial: Learn Excel in five hours with this course. http://excelcentral.com/
125.
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
126.
Writing up your research - Developing Your Research Project. https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/research-project/0/steps/4071
127.
The Everyday Maths Project. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/research/impact/social-sciences-law/soe/impact-story-rose-everyday-maths-resources/
128.
Jay, Tim. Finding ‘Mathematics’: Parents Questioning School-Centered Approaches to Involvement in Children’s Mathematics Learning. School Community Journal. 27(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Finding+%22Mathematics%22%3a+Parents+Questioning+School-Centered+Approaches+to+Involvement+in+Children%27s+Mathematics+Learnin&id=EJ1146482
129.
The Everyday Maths Project: Empowering parents of primary school pupils to support their children’s maths learning, through the mathematics they use in everyday life. http://www.everydaymaths.org/images/docs/EverydayMathsBooklet.pdf
130.
Coles A, Scott H. Planning for the unexpected in the mathematics classroom: an account of teacher and student change. Research in Mathematics Education. 2015;17(2):128-147. doi:10.1080/14794802.2015.1047787
131.
Badley G. Academic writing as shaping and re-shaping. Teaching in Higher Education. 2009;14(2):209-219. doi:10.1080/13562510902757294
132.
Canagarajah, A. Suresh. From Critical Research Practice to Critical Research Reporting. TESOL Quarterly. 30(2). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2307/3588146
133.
Cook BG, Cook L, Landrum TJ. Moving Research into Practice: Can We Make Dissemination Stick? Exceptional Children. 2013;79(3):163-180. doi:10.1177/001440291307900203
134.
Hoveid MH. Educational Research and Useful Knowledge: Production, Dissemination, Reception, Implementation. European Educational Research Journal. 2012;11(1):58-61. doi:10.2304/eerj.2012.11.1.58
135.
Mind maps, presentational knowledge and the dissemination of qualitative research. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/1577/1/0910_mindmaps.pdf
136.
Trainor AA, Graue E. Evaluating Rigor in Qualitative Methodology and Research Dissemination. Remedial and Special Education. 2014;35(5):267-274. doi:10.1177/0741932514528100
137.
Wellington JJ. Educational Research: Contemporary Issues and Practical Approaches. Bloomsbury Academic; 2015. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNDcyNTIyMDA5L3BkZjJodG1sZXgvaW5kZXguaHRtbCJ9
138.
Paulson, J. (2015) ‘Whether and how?’ History education about recent and ongoing conflict: A review of research. https://research-information.bristol.ac.uk/files/99531923/Paulson_JEiE_2015.pdf
139.
Watton P, Collings J, Moon J. Reflective Writing: Guidance notes for students. https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/2/2542/reflective-writing-guidance__1_.pdf
140.
Boote DN, Beile P. Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation. Educational Researcher. 2005;34(6):3-15. doi:10.3102/0013189X034006003
