[1]
Ahl, F. 1976. Lucan: an introduction. Cornell University Press.
[2]
Ando, C. 2000. Imperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman Empire. University of California Press.
[3]
Anthony R. Birley 2000. The Life and Death of Cornelius Tacitus. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. (2000), 230–247.
[4]
Arachnion, n. 3 - Fantham: The ambiguity of Virtus in Lucan’s Civil War and Statius’ Thebaid: http://www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num3/fantham.html.
[5]
Ash, R. 1999. Ordering anarchy: armies and leaders in Tacitus’ Histories. Duckworth.
[6]
Bannon, C.J. 1997. The brothers of Romulus: fraternal pietas in Roman law, literature, and society. Princeton University Press.
[7]
Bartsch, S. 1997. Ideology in cold blood: a reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Harvard University Press.
[8]
Bexley, E.M. 2009. Replacing Rome: Geographic and Political Centrality in Lucan’s Pharsalia. Classical Philology. 104, 4 (Oct. 2009), 459–475. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/650980.
[9]
Boyle, A.J. 1990. The Imperial muse: Ramus essays on Roman literature of the Empire : Flavian Epicist to Claudian. Aureal Publications.
[10]
Breed, B.W. et al. 2010. Citizens of discord: Rome and its civil wars. Oxford University Press.
[11]
Brian, W. 2013. Reading Death and the Senses in Lucan and Lucretius. Synaesthesia and the ancient senses. Acumen. 115–125.
[12]
Cairns, F. et al. 2003. Caesar against liberty?: perspectives on his autocracy. Francis Cairns.
[13]
CHARLES, M.B. and ANAGNOSTOU-LAOUTIDES, E. 2014. Unmanning an emperor: Otho in the literary tradition. The Classical journal. 109, 2 (2014), 199–222.
[14]
Coffee, N. 2009. The commerce of war: exchange and social order in Latin epic. University of Chicago Press.
[15]
D’Alessandro Behr, F. 2007. Feeling history: Lucan, stoicism, and the poetics of passion. Ohio State University Press.
[16]
David, L. 2010. Speeches in the Histories. The Cambridge companion to Tacitus. Cambridge University Press. 212–224.
[17]
David, L. 1999. Tacitus’ Histories and the theory of deliberative oratory. The limits of historiography: genre and narrative in ancient historical texts. Brill. 197–216.
[18]
Day, H.J.M. 2013. Lucan and the sublime: power, representation and aesthetic experience. Cambridge University Press.
[19]
Dinter, M.T. 2012. Anatomizing Civil War: studies in Lucan’s epic technique. University of Michigan Press.
[20]
Duncan, K. 1992. Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference. Roman poetry and propaganda in the age of Augustus. Bristol Classical Press. 26–58.
[21]
Fantham, E. 2003. The angry poet and the angry gods : problems of theodicy in Lucan’s epic of defeat. Ancient anger: perspectives from Homer to Galen. Yale classical studies, (2003), 229–249.
[22]
Feeney, D.C. 1986. ‘Stat Magni Nominis Umbra.’ Lucan on the Greatness of Pompeius Magnus. The Classical Quarterly. 36, 01 (May 1986). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800010685.
[23]
FRASER, C.B. 2007. OTHO’S FUNNY WALK: TACITUS, HISTORIES 1.27. The Classical Quarterly. 57, 02 (Dec. 2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838807000596.
[24]
George, David B 1988. Lucan’s Caesar and Stoic οἰκείωσις. The Stoic fool. Transactions of the American Philological Association. (1988), 331–341. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/284175.
[25]
George, D.B. 1991. Lucan’s Cato and Stoic Attitudes to the Republic. Classical Antiquity. 10, 2 (Oct. 1991), 237–258. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/25010951.
[26]
Gibson, Bruce John 1998. Rumours as causes of events in Tacitus. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici. (1998), 111–129. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/40236120.
[27]
Glenn W, M. 1992. Disiecti membra poetae: The rhetoric of dismemberment in Neronian poetry. Innovations of antiquity. Routledge. 391–419.
[28]
Griffin, M. 2003. Clementia after Caesar: from Politics to Philosophy. Caesar against liberty?: perspectives on his autocracy. Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar, (2003), 157–182.
[29]
Griffin, M. 1986. Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: II. Greece and Rome. 33, 02 (Oct. 1986), 192–202. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500030357.
[30]
Griffin, Miriam T 1986. Philosophy, Cato, and Roman suicide. Greece and Rome. (1986), 64–77.
[31]
Gunderson, E. 1996. The Ideology of the Arena. Classical Antiquity. 15, 1 (Apr. 1996), 113–151. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/25011033.
[32]
Gurval, R.A. 1995. Actium and Augustus: the politics and emotions of civil war. University of Michigan Press.
[33]
Hallett, J.P. 1977. Perusinae glandes and the changing image of Augustus. American journal of ancient history. 2, (1977), 151–171.
[34]
Hardie, P.R. 1993. The epic successors of Virgil: a study in the dynamics of a tradition. Cambridge University Press.
[35]
Haynes, H. 2003. The history of make-believe: Tacitus on imperial Rome. University of California Press.
[36]
Henderson, J. 1998. Fighting for Rome: poets and Caesars, history and civil war. Cambridge University Press.
[37]
Henderson, J. 1989. Tacitus/The World in Pieces. Ramus. 18, 1–2 (1989), 167–210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048671X00003088.
[38]
Hershkowitz, D. 1998. The madness of epic: reading insanity from Homer to Statius. Clarendon Press.
[39]
Johnson, W.R. 1987. Momentary monsters: Lucan and his heroes. Cornell University Press.
[40]
Joseph, T.A. 2012. Tacitus, the epic successor: Virgil, Lucan, and the narrative of civil war in the Histories. Brill.
[41]
Keitel, E. 1987. Otho’s Exhortations in Tacitus’ Histories. Greece and Rome. 34, 01 (Apr. 1987), 73–82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500027716.
[42]
Keitel, E 2006. ‘Sententia’ and structure in Tacitus ‘Histories 1.12-49’. Arethusa. 39, 2 (2006), 219–244. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2006.0014.
[43]
Leeman, A.D. 1973. Structure and meaning in the prologues of Tacitus. Studies in Latin language and literature. Yale classical studies, (1973), 169–208.
[44]
Leigh, M. 1997. Lucan: spectacle and engagement. Clarendon Press.
[45]
LONG, A. 2007. LUCAN AND MORAL LUCK. The Classical Quarterly. 57, 01 (May 2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S000983880700016X.
[46]
Lovatt, H. 1999. Competing endings : re-reading the end of the Thebaid through Lucan. Ramus. 28, 2 (1999), 126–151.
[47]
Marincola, J.M. 1999. Tacitus’ prefaces and the decline of imperial historiography. Latomus. 58, 2 (1999), 391–404.
[48]
Masters, J. Poetry and civil war in Lucan’s Bellum civile.
[49]
McGuire, D.T. 1989. Textual Strategies and Political Suicide in Flavian Epic. Ramus. 18, 1–2 (1989), 21–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048671X00003027.
[50]
Miller, N.P. 1977. Tacitus’ Narrative Technique. Greece and Rome. 24, 01 (Apr. 1977), 13–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500019574.
[51]
Morford, M.P.O. 1967. The poet Lucan: studies in rhetorical epic. Blackwell.
[52]
Morgan, G. 2006. 69 A.D.: the year of four emperors. Oxford University Press.
[53]
Nix, Sarah A. 2008. Caesar as Jupiter in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Classical Journal. 103, 3 (2008), 281–294.
[54]
O’Gorman, E. 1995. Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war. Hermathena. 158 (1995), 117–131.
[55]
O’Gorman, E. 1995. Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war. Hermathena. 158 (1995), 117–131.
[56]
O’Higgins, D. 1988. Lucan as ‘Vates’. Classical Antiquity. 7, 2 (Oct. 1988), 208–226. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/25010888.
[57]
Ormand, K. 1994. Lucan’s ‘Auctor Vix Fidelis’. Classical Antiquity. 13, 1 (Apr. 1994), 38–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/25011004.
[58]
Osgood, J. 2006. Caesar’s legacy: civil war and the emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge University Press.
[59]
Pagán, V.E. 2012. A companion to Tacitus. Wiley-Blackwell.
[60]
Paul, George M 1982. Urbs capta. Sketch of an ancient literary motif. The Phoenix. (1982), 144–155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1087673.
[61]
Perkins, C.A. 1993. Tacitus on Otho. Latomus. 52, (1993), 848–855.
[62]
Philip, H. 2010. Crowds and Leaders in Imperial Historiography and Epic. Latin historiography and poetry in the early empire: generic interactions. Brill. 9–27.
[63]
Plass, P. 1988. Wit and the writing of history: the rhetoric of historiography in Imperial Rome. University of Wisconsin Press.
[64]
Pomeroy, Aj 2006. Theatricality in Tacitus’s ‘Histories’. Arethusa. 39, 2 (2006), 171–191. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2006.0018.
[65]
Rhiannon, A. 2010. Fission and fusion: shifting Roman identities in the Histories. The Cambridge companion to Tacitus. Cambridge University Press. 85–99.
[66]
Rhiannon, A. 2010. Tarda Moles Ciuilis Belli: The Weight of the Past in Tacitus’ Histories’ in Brian Breed. Citizens of discord: Rome and its civil wars. Oxford University Press. 119–131.
[67]
Roller, M.B. 1996. Ethical Contradiction and the Fractured Community in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Classical Antiquity. 15, 2 (Oct. 1996), 319–347. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/25011044.
[68]
Rossi, A 2000. The ‘Aeneid’ revisited: The journey of Pompey in Lucan’s ‘Pharsalia’. American Journal Of Philology. 121, 4 (2000), 571–591.
[69]
Sailor, D. 2008. Writing and empire in Tacitus. Cambridge University Press.
[70]
Saylor, C. 1999. Lucan and Models of the Introduction. Mnemosyne. 52, 5 (Oct. 1999), 545–553. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/156852599323224626.
[71]
Scarry, E. 1985. The body in pain: the making and unmaking of the world. Oxford University Press.
[72]
Seo, J.M. 2013. Exemplary traits: reading characterization in Roman poetry. Oxford University Press.
[73]
Sinclair, P. 1995. Tacitus the sententious historian: a sociology of rhetoric in Annales 1-6. Pennsylvania State University Press.
[74]
Sklenar, R 1999. Nihilistic Cosmology and Catonian Ethics in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. American Journal of Philology. 120, 2 (1999), 281–296.
[75]
Sontag, S. 2004. Regarding the pain of others. Penguin Books.
[76]
Spencer, D. 2005. Lucan’s Follies: Memory and Ruin in a Civil-war Landscape. Greece and Rome. 52, 1 (Jan. 2005), 46–69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/gromej/cxi008.
[77]
STOVER, T. 2008. CATO AND THE INTENDED SCOPE OF LUCAN’S BELLUM CIVILE. The Classical Quarterly. 58, 02 (Dec. 2008). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838808000645.
[78]
Sullivan, J.P. 1985. Literature and politics in the age of Nero. Cornell University Press.
[79]
Syme, R. 1958. Tacitus: Vol.1. Clarendon Press.
[80]
Syme, R. 1958. Tacitus: Vol.2. Clarendon Press.
[81]
Tesoriero, C. et al. 2010. Lucan. Oxford University Press.
[82]
Timothy, J. 2012. Repetita bellorum civilium memoria: the remembrance of civil war and its literature in Tacitus, Histories 1.50’. Time and narrative in ancient historiography: the ‘plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian. Cambridge University Press. 156–174.
[83]
Walker, B. 1976. A Study in Incoherence: The First Book of Tacitus’ Histories. Classical Philology. 71, 1 (Jan. 1976), 113–118. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/366241.
[84]
Willis, I. 2011. Now and Rome: Lucan and Vergil as theorists of politics and space. Continuum.
[85]
Woodman, A.J. and Cambridge Collections Online (Online service) 2010. The Cambridge companion to Tacitus. Cambridge University Press.