1
Ando C. Imperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman Empire. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2000. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pp8t9
2
Bannon CJ. The brothers of Romulus: fraternal pietas in Roman law, literature, and society. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 1997.
3
Boyle AJ. The Imperial muse: Ramus essays on Roman literature of the Empire : Flavian Epicist to Claudian. Bendigo, Vic., Australia: : Aureal Publications 1990.
4
Breed BW, Damon C, Rossi A. Citizens of discord: Rome and its civil wars. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010.
5
Cairns F, Fantham E, Langford Latin Seminar. Caesar against liberty?: perspectives on his autocracy. Cambridge: : Francis Cairns 2003.
6
Griffin, Miriam T. Philosophy, Cato, and Roman suicide. Greece and Rome 1986;:64–77.http://www.jstor.org/stable/643026
7
Griffin M. Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: II. Greece and Rome 1986;33:192–202. doi:10.1017/S0017383500030357
8
Gunderson E. The Ideology of the Arena. Classical Antiquity 1996;15:113–51. doi:10.2307/25011033
9
Gurval RA. Actium and Augustus: the politics and emotions of civil war. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 1995.
10
Hallett JP. Perusinae glandes and the changing image of Augustus. American journal of ancient history 1977;2:151–71.
11
Hardie PR. The epic successors of Virgil: a study in the dynamics of a tradition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.
12
Philip H. Crowds and Leaders in Imperial Historiography and Epic. In: Latin historiography and poetry in the early empire: generic interactions. Leiden: : Brill 2010. 9–27.http://pmt-eu.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg485432740&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg485432740&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&mode=Basic&vid=44BU_VU1&tab=tab2&vl(freeText0)=Latin%20Historiography%20and%20Poetry%20in%20the%20Early%20Empire%3A%20Generic%20Interactions%2C%20Leiden&dstmp=1497275531829&tabs=viewOnlineTab&gathStatTab=true
13
Henderson J. Fighting for Rome: poets and Caesars, history and civil war. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
14
Hershkowitz D. The madness of epic: reading insanity from Homer to Statius. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1998.
15
Duncan K. Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference. In: Roman poetry and propaganda in the age of Augustus. Bristol: : Bristol Classical Press 1992. 26–58.
16
McGuire DT. Textual Strategies and Political Suicide in Flavian Epic. Ramus 1989;18:21–45. doi:10.1017/S0048671X00003027
17
Glenn W M. Disiecti membra poetae: The rhetoric of dismemberment in Neronian poetry. In: Innovations of antiquity. London: : Routledge 1992. 391–419.
18
Osgood J. Caesar’s legacy: civil war and the emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006.
19
Paul, George M. Urbs capta. Sketch of an ancient literary motif. The Phoenix 1982;:144–55. doi:10.2307/1087673
20
Scarry E. The body in pain: the making and unmaking of the world. New York: : Oxford University Press 1985.
21
Sontag S. Regarding the pain of others. London: : Penguin Books 2004.
22
Sullivan JP. Literature and politics in the age of Nero. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 1985.
23
Ahl F. Lucan: an introduction. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 1976.
24
Bartsch S. Ideology in cold blood: a reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1997.
25
Bexley EM. Replacing Rome: Geographic and Political Centrality in Lucan’s Pharsalia. Classical Philology 2009;104:459–75. doi:10.1086/650980
26
Coffee N. The commerce of war: exchange and social order in Latin epic. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2009.
27
D’Alessandro Behr F. Feeling history: Lucan, stoicism, and the poetics of passion. Columbus: : Ohio State University Press 2007.
28
Day HJM. Lucan and the sublime: power, representation and aesthetic experience. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781107305656
29
Dinter MT. Anatomizing Civil War: studies in Lucan’s epic technique. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 2012.
30
Elaine F. Arachnion, n. 3 - Fantham: The ambiguity of Virtus in Lucan’s Civil War and Statius’ Thebaid. http://www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num3/fantham.html
31
Fantham E. The angry poet and the angry gods : problems of theodicy in Lucan’s epic of defeat. Ancient anger: perspectives from Homer to Galen 2003;Yale classical studies:229–49.
32
Feeney DC. ‘Stat Magni Nominis Umbra.’ Lucan on the Greatness of Pompeius Magnus. The Classical Quarterly 1986;36. doi:10.1017/S0009838800010685
33
George, David B. Lucan’s Caesar and Stoic οἰκείωσις. The Stoic fool. Transactions of the American Philological Association 1988;:331–41. doi:10.2307/284175
34
George DB. Lucan’s Cato and Stoic Attitudes to the Republic. Classical Antiquity 1991;10:237–58. doi:10.2307/25010951
35
Griffin M. Clementia after Caesar: from Politics to Philosophy. Caesar against liberty?: perspectives on his autocracy 2003;Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar:157–82.
36
Johnson WR. Momentary monsters: Lucan and his heroes. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 1987.
37
Leigh M. Lucan: spectacle and engagement. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1997.
38
LONG A. LUCAN AND MORAL LUCK. The Classical Quarterly 2007;57. doi:10.1017/S000983880700016X
39
Lovatt H. Competing endings : re-reading the end of the Thebaid through Lucan. Ramus 1999;28:126–51.
40
Masters J. Poetry and civil war in Lucan’s Bellum civile. Cambridge.
41
Morford MPO. The poet Lucan: studies in rhetorical epic. Oxford: : Blackwell 1967.
42
Nix, Sarah A. Caesar as Jupiter in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Classical Journal 2008;103:281–94.http://www.jstor.org/stable/30037963
43
O’Gorman E. Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war. Hermathena 1995;:117–31.
44
O’Higgins D. Lucan as ‘Vates’. Classical Antiquity 1988;7:208–26. doi:10.2307/25010888
45
Ormand K. Lucan’s ‘Auctor Vix Fidelis’. Classical Antiquity 1994;13:38–55. doi:10.2307/25011004
46
Roller MB. Ethical Contradiction and the Fractured Community in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Classical Antiquity 1996;15:319–47. doi:10.2307/25011044
47
Rossi, A. The ‘Aeneid’ revisited: The journey of Pompey in Lucan’s ‘Pharsalia’. American Journal Of Philology 2000;121:571–91.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561727?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
48
Saylor C. Lucan and Models of the Introduction. Mnemosyne 1999;52:545–53. doi:10.1163/156852599323224626
49
Seo JM. Exemplary traits: reading characterization in Roman poetry. New York: : Oxford University Press 2013. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199734283.001.0001
50
Sklenar, R. Nihilistic Cosmology and Catonian Ethics in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. American Journal of Philology 1999;120:281–96.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561868
51
Spencer D. Lucan’s Follies: Memory and Ruin in a Civil-war Landscape. Greece and Rome 2005;52:46–69. doi:10.1093/gromej/cxi008
52
STOVER T. CATO AND THE INTENDED SCOPE OF LUCAN’S BELLUM CIVILE. The Classical Quarterly 2008;58. doi:10.1017/S0009838808000645
53
Tesoriero C, Muecke F, Neal T. Lucan. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010.
54
Brian W. Reading Death and the Senses in Lucan and Lucretius. In: Synaesthesia and the ancient senses. Durham: : Acumen 2013. 115–25.
55
Willis I. Now and Rome: Lucan and Vergil as theorists of politics and space. London: : Continuum 2011.
56
Ash R. Ordering anarchy: armies and leaders in Tacitus’ Histories. London: : Duckworth 1999.
57
Rhiannon A. Fission and fusion: shifting Roman identities in the Histories. In: The Cambridge companion to Tacitus. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. 85–99.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
58
Rhiannon A. Tarda Moles Ciuilis Belli: The Weight of the Past in Tacitus’ Histories’ in Brian Breed. In: Citizens of discord: Rome and its civil wars. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. 119–31.
59
Anthony R. Birley. The Life and Death of Cornelius Tacitus. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 2000;:230–47.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4436577?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60
CHARLES MB, ANAGNOSTOU-LAOUTIDES E. Unmanning an emperor: Otho in the literary tradition. The Classical journal 2014;109:199–222.
61
FRASER CB. OTHO’S FUNNY WALK: TACITUS, HISTORIES 1.27. The Classical Quarterly 2007;57. doi:10.1017/S0009838807000596
62
Gibson, Bruce John. Rumours as causes of events in Tacitus. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 1998;:111–29. doi:10.2307/40236120
63
Haynes H. The history of make-believe: Tacitus on imperial Rome. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2003.
64
Henderson J. Tacitus/The World in Pieces. Ramus 1989;18:167–210. doi:10.1017/S0048671X00003088
65
Timothy J. Repetita bellorum civilium memoria: the remembrance of civil war and its literature in Tacitus, Histories 1.50’. In: Time and narrative in ancient historiography: the ‘plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012. 156–74.
66
Joseph TA. Tacitus, the epic successor: Virgil, Lucan, and the narrative of civil war in the Histories. Leiden: : Brill 2012. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9789004231283
67
Keitel E. Otho’s Exhortations in Tacitus’ Histories. Greece and Rome 1987;34:73–82. doi:10.1017/S0017383500027716
68
Keitel, E. ‘Sententia’ and structure in Tacitus ‘Histories 1.12-49’. Arethusa 2006;39:219–44. doi:10.1353/are.2006.0014
69
Leeman AD. Structure and meaning in the prologues of Tacitus. Studies in Latin language and literature 1973;Yale classical studies:169–208.
70
David L. Tacitus’ Histories and the theory of deliberative oratory. In: The limits of historiography: genre and narrative in ancient historical texts. Leiden: : Brill 1999. 197–216.
71
David L. Speeches in the Histories. In: The Cambridge companion to Tacitus. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. 212–24.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
72
Marincola JM. Tacitus’ prefaces and the decline of imperial historiography. Latomus 1999;58:391–404.
73
Miller NP. Tacitus’ Narrative Technique. Greece and Rome 1977;24:13–22. doi:10.1017/S0017383500019574
74
Morgan G. 69 A.D.: the year of four emperors. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006.
75
O’Gorman E. Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war. Hermathena 1995;:117–31.
76
Pagán VE. A companion to Tacitus. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781444354188
77
Perkins CA. Tacitus on Otho. Latomus 1993;52:848–55.
78
Plass P. Wit and the writing of history: the rhetoric of historiography in Imperial Rome. Madison: : University of Wisconsin Press 1988.
79
Pomeroy, Aj. Theatricality in Tacitus’s ‘Histories’. Arethusa 2006;39:171–91. doi:10.1353/are.2006.0018
80
Sailor D. Writing and empire in Tacitus. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511482366
81
Sinclair P. Tacitus the sententious historian: a sociology of rhetoric in Annales 1-6. University Park, Penn: : Pennsylvania State University Press 1995.
82
Syme R. Tacitus: Vol.1. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1958.
83
Syme R. Tacitus: Vol.2. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1958.
84
Walker B. A Study in Incoherence: The First Book of Tacitus’ Histories. Classical Philology 1976;71:113–8. doi:10.1086/366241
85
Woodman AJ, Cambridge Collections Online (Online service). The Cambridge companion to Tacitus. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
