[1]
C. Ando, Imperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman Empire, vol. Classics and contemporary thought. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pp8t9
[2]
C. J. Bannon, The brothers of Romulus: fraternal pietas in Roman law, literature, and society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
[3]
A. J. Boyle, The Imperial muse: Ramus essays on Roman literature of the Empire : Flavian Epicist to Claudian. Bendigo, Vic., Australia: Aureal Publications, 1990.
[4]
B. W. Breed, C. Damon, and A. Rossi, Citizens of discord: Rome and its civil wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[5]
F. Cairns, E. Fantham, and Langford Latin Seminar, Caesar against liberty?: perspectives on his autocracy, vol. Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Cambridge: Francis Cairns, 2003.
[6]
Griffin, Miriam T, ‘Philosophy, Cato, and Roman suicide’, Greece and Rome, pp. 64–77, 1986 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/643026
[7]
M. Griffin, ‘Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: II’, Greece and Rome, vol. 33, no. 02, pp. 192–202, Oct. 1986, doi: 10.1017/S0017383500030357.
[8]
E. Gunderson, ‘The Ideology of the Arena’, Classical Antiquity, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 113–151, Apr. 1996, doi: 10.2307/25011033.
[9]
R. A. Gurval, Actium and Augustus: the politics and emotions of civil war. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.
[10]
J. P. Hallett, ‘Perusinae glandes and the changing image of Augustus’, American journal of ancient history, vol. 2, pp. 151–171, 1977.
[11]
P. R. Hardie, The epic successors of Virgil: a study in the dynamics of a tradition, vol. Roman literature and its contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[12]
H. Philip, ‘Crowds and Leaders in Imperial Historiography and Epic’, in Latin historiography and poetry in the early empire: generic interactions, vol. Mnemosyne supplements, Leiden: Brill, 2010, pp. 9–27 [Online]. Available: http://pmt-eu.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg485432740&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg485432740&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&mode=Basic&vid=44BU_VU1&tab=tab2&vl(freeText0)=Latin%20Historiography%20and%20Poetry%20in%20the%20Early%20Empire%3A%20Generic%20Interactions%2C%20Leiden&dstmp=1497275531829&tabs=viewOnlineTab&gathStatTab=true
[13]
J. Henderson, Fighting for Rome: poets and Caesars, history and civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[14]
D. Hershkowitz, The madness of epic: reading insanity from Homer to Statius, vol. Oxford classical monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
[15]
K. Duncan, ‘Augustan’ and “Anti-Augustan”: Reflections on Terms of Reference’, in Roman poetry and propaganda in the age of Augustus, Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, 1992, pp. 26–58.
[16]
D. T. McGuire, ‘Textual Strategies and Political Suicide in Flavian Epic’, Ramus, vol. 18, no. 1–2, pp. 21–45, 1989, doi: 10.1017/S0048671X00003027.
[17]
M. Glenn W, ‘Disiecti membra poetae: The rhetoric of dismemberment in Neronian poetry’, in Innovations of antiquity, vol. New ancient world, London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 391–419.
[18]
J. Osgood, Caesar’s legacy: civil war and the emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[19]
Paul, George M, ‘Urbs capta. Sketch of an ancient literary motif’, The Phoenix, pp. 144–155, 1982, doi: 10.2307/1087673.
[20]
E. Scarry, The body in pain: the making and unmaking of the world. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.
[21]
S. Sontag, Regarding the pain of others. London: Penguin Books, 2004.
[22]
J. P. Sullivan, Literature and politics in the age of Nero. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985.
[23]
F. Ahl, Lucan: an introduction, vol. Cornell studies in classical philology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1976.
[24]
S. Bartsch, Ideology in cold blood: a reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997.
[25]
E. M. Bexley, ‘Replacing Rome: Geographic and Political Centrality in Lucan’s Pharsalia’, Classical Philology, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 459–475, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1086/650980.
[26]
N. Coffee, The commerce of war: exchange and social order in Latin epic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
[27]
F. D’Alessandro Behr, Feeling history: Lucan, stoicism, and the poetics of passion. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2007.
[28]
H. J. M. Day, Lucan and the sublime: power, representation and aesthetic experience, vol. Cambridge classical studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781107305656
[29]
M. T. Dinter, Anatomizing Civil War: studies in Lucan’s epic technique. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2012.
[30]
F. Elaine, ‘Arachnion, n. 3 - Fantham: The ambiguity of Virtus in Lucan’s Civil War and Statius’ Thebaid’. [Online]. Available: http://www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num3/fantham.html
[31]
E. Fantham, ‘The angry poet and the angry gods : problems of theodicy in Lucan’s epic of defeat’, Ancient anger: perspectives from Homer to Galen, vol. Yale classical studies, pp. 229–249, 2003.
[32]
D. C. Feeney, ‘“Stat Magni Nominis Umbra.” Lucan on the Greatness of Pompeius Magnus’, The Classical Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 01, May 1986, doi: 10.1017/S0009838800010685.
[33]
George, David B, ‘Lucan’s Caesar and Stoic οἰκείωσις. The Stoic fool’, Transactions of the American Philological Association, pp. 331–341, 1988, doi: 10.2307/284175.
[34]
D. B. George, ‘Lucan’s Cato and Stoic Attitudes to the Republic’, Classical Antiquity, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 237–258, Oct. 1991, doi: 10.2307/25010951.
[35]
M. Griffin, ‘Clementia after Caesar: from Politics to Philosophy’, Caesar against liberty?: perspectives on his autocracy, vol. Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar, pp. 157–182, 2003.
[36]
W. R. Johnson, Momentary monsters: Lucan and his heroes, vol. Cornell studies in classical philology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.
[37]
M. Leigh, Lucan: spectacle and engagement, vol. Oxford classical monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
[38]
A. LONG, ‘LUCAN AND MORAL LUCK’, The Classical Quarterly, vol. 57, no. 01, May 2007, doi: 10.1017/S000983880700016X.
[39]
H. Lovatt, ‘Competing endings : re-reading the end of the Thebaid through Lucan’, Ramus, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 126–151, 1999.
[40]
J. Masters, Poetry and civil war in Lucan’s Bellum civile, Cambridge., vol. Cambridge classical studies. .
[41]
M. P. O. Morford, The poet Lucan: studies in rhetorical epic. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967.
[42]
Nix, Sarah A., ‘Caesar as Jupiter in Lucan’s “Bellum Civile”’, Classical Journal, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 281–294, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30037963
[43]
E. O’Gorman, ‘Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war’, Hermathena, no. 158, pp. 117–131, 1995.
[44]
D. O’Higgins, ‘Lucan as “Vates”’, Classical Antiquity, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 208–226, Oct. 1988, doi: 10.2307/25010888.
[45]
K. Ormand, ‘Lucan’s “Auctor Vix Fidelis”’, Classical Antiquity, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 38–55, Apr. 1994, doi: 10.2307/25011004.
[46]
M. B. Roller, ‘Ethical Contradiction and the Fractured Community in Lucan’s “Bellum Civile”’, Classical Antiquity, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 319–347, Oct. 1996, doi: 10.2307/25011044.
[47]
Rossi, A, ‘The “Aeneid” revisited: The journey of Pompey in Lucan’s “Pharsalia”’, American Journal Of Philology, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 571–591, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561727?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[48]
C. Saylor, ‘Lucan and Models of the Introduction’, Mnemosyne, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 545–553, Oct. 1999, doi: 10.1163/156852599323224626.
[49]
J. M. Seo, Exemplary traits: reading characterization in Roman poetry. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199734283.001.0001/acprof-9780199734283
[50]
Sklenar, R, ‘Nihilistic Cosmology and Catonian Ethics in Lucan’s Bellum Civile’, American Journal of Philology, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 281–296, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561868
[51]
D. Spencer, ‘Lucan’s Follies: Memory and Ruin in a Civil-war Landscape’, Greece and Rome, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 46–69, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1093/gromej/cxi008.
[52]
T. STOVER, ‘CATO AND THE INTENDED SCOPE OF LUCAN’S BELLUM CIVILE’, The Classical Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 02, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1017/S0009838808000645.
[53]
C. Tesoriero, F. Muecke, and T. Neal, Lucan, vol. Oxford readings in classical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[54]
W. Brian, ‘Reading Death and the Senses in Lucan and Lucretius’, in Synaesthesia and the ancient senses, vol. The senses in antiquity, Durham: Acumen, 2013, pp. 115–125.
[55]
I. Willis, Now and Rome: Lucan and Vergil as theorists of politics and space. London: Continuum, 2011.
[56]
R. Ash, Ordering anarchy: armies and leaders in Tacitus’ Histories. London: Duckworth, 1999.
[57]
A. Rhiannon, ‘Fission and fusion: shifting Roman identities in the Histories’, in The Cambridge companion to Tacitus, vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 85–99 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
[58]
A. Rhiannon, ‘Tarda Moles Ciuilis Belli: The Weight of the Past in Tacitus’ Histories’ in Brian Breed’, in Citizens of discord: Rome and its civil wars, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 119–131.
[59]
Anthony R. Birley, ‘The Life and Death of Cornelius Tacitus’, Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, pp. 230–247, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4436577?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[60]
M. B. CHARLES and E. ANAGNOSTOU-LAOUTIDES, ‘Unmanning an emperor: Otho in the literary tradition’, The Classical journal, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 199–222, 2014.
[61]
C. B. FRASER, ‘OTHO’S FUNNY WALK: TACITUS, HISTORIES 1.27’, The Classical Quarterly, vol. 57, no. 02, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1017/S0009838807000596.
[62]
Gibson, Bruce John, ‘Rumours as causes of events in Tacitus’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici, pp. 111–129, 1998, doi: 10.2307/40236120.
[63]
H. Haynes, The history of make-believe: Tacitus on imperial Rome, vol. The Joan Palevsky imprint in classical literature. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2003.
[64]
J. Henderson, ‘Tacitus/The World in Pieces’, Ramus, vol. 18, no. 1–2, pp. 167–210, 1989, doi: 10.1017/S0048671X00003088.
[65]
J. Timothy, ‘Repetita bellorum civilium memoria: the remembrance of civil war and its literature in Tacitus, Histories 1.50’’, in Time and narrative in ancient historiography: the ‘plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 156–174.
[66]
T. A. Joseph, Tacitus, the epic successor: Virgil, Lucan, and the narrative of civil war in the Histories, vol. Mnemosyne supplements. Leiden: Brill, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9789004231283
[67]
E. Keitel, ‘Otho’s Exhortations in Tacitus’ Histories’, Greece and Rome, vol. 34, no. 01, pp. 73–82, Apr. 1987, doi: 10.1017/S0017383500027716.
[68]
Keitel, E, ‘“Sententia” and structure in Tacitus “Histories 1.12-49”’, Arethusa, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 219–244, 2006, doi: 10.1353/are.2006.0014.
[69]
A. D. Leeman, ‘Structure and meaning in the prologues of Tacitus’, Studies in Latin language and literature, vol. Yale classical studies, pp. 169–208, 1973.
[70]
L. David, ‘Tacitus’ Histories and the theory of deliberative oratory’, in The limits of historiography: genre and narrative in ancient historical texts, vol. Mnemosyne, Leiden: Brill, 1999, pp. 197–216.
[71]
L. David, ‘Speeches in the Histories’, in The Cambridge companion to Tacitus, vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 212–224 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
[72]
J. M. Marincola, ‘Tacitus’ prefaces and the decline of imperial historiography’, Latomus, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 391–404, 1999.
[73]
N. P. Miller, ‘Tacitus’ Narrative Technique’, Greece and Rome, vol. 24, no. 01, pp. 13–22, Apr. 1977, doi: 10.1017/S0017383500019574.
[74]
G. Morgan, 69 A.D.: the year of four emperors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[75]
E. O’Gorman, ‘Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war’, Hermathena, no. 158, pp. 117–131, 1995.
[76]
V. E. Pagán, A companion to Tacitus, vol. Blackwell companions to the ancient world. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781444354188
[77]
C. A. Perkins, ‘Tacitus on Otho’, Latomus, vol. 52, pp. 848–855, 1993.
[78]
P. Plass, Wit and the writing of history: the rhetoric of historiography in Imperial Rome, vol. Wisconsin studies in classics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988.
[79]
Pomeroy, Aj, ‘Theatricality in Tacitus’s “Histories”’, Arethusa, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 171–191, 2006, doi: 10.1353/are.2006.0018.
[80]
D. Sailor, Writing and empire in Tacitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[81]
P. Sinclair, Tacitus the sententious historian: a sociology of rhetoric in Annales 1-6. University Park, Penn: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.
[82]
R. Syme, Tacitus: Vol.1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958.
[83]
R. Syme, Tacitus: Vol.2. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958.
[84]
B. Walker, ‘A Study in Incoherence: The First Book of Tacitus’ Histories’, Classical Philology, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 113–118, Jan. 1976, doi: 10.1086/366241.
[85]
A. J. Woodman and Cambridge Collections Online (Online service), The Cambridge companion to Tacitus, vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
