1.
Ando, C.: Imperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman Empire. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif (2000).
2.
Bannon, C.J.: The brothers of Romulus: fraternal pietas in Roman law, literature, and society. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1997).
3.
Boyle, A.J.: The Imperial muse: Ramus essays on Roman literature of the Empire : Flavian Epicist to Claudian. Aureal Publications, Bendigo, Vic., Australia (1990).
4.
Breed, B.W., Damon, C., Rossi, A.: Citizens of discord: Rome and its civil wars. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
5.
Cairns, F., Fantham, E., Langford Latin Seminar: Caesar against liberty?: perspectives on his autocracy. Francis Cairns, Cambridge (2003).
6.
Griffin, Miriam T: Philosophy, Cato, and Roman suicide. Greece and Rome. 64–77 (1986).
7.
Griffin, M.: Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: II. Greece and Rome. 33, 192–202 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500030357.
8.
Gunderson, E.: The Ideology of the Arena. Classical Antiquity. 15, 113–151 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/25011033.
9.
Gurval, R.A.: Actium and Augustus: the politics and emotions of civil war. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1995).
10.
Hallett, J.P.: Perusinae glandes and the changing image of Augustus. American journal of ancient history. 2, 151–171 (1977).
11.
Hardie, P.R.: The epic successors of Virgil: a study in the dynamics of a tradition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993).
12.
Philip, H.: Crowds and Leaders in Imperial Historiography and Epic. In: Latin historiography and poetry in the early empire: generic interactions. pp. 9–27. Brill, Leiden (2010).
13.
Henderson, J.: Fighting for Rome: poets and Caesars, history and civil war. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).
14.
Hershkowitz, D.: The madness of epic: reading insanity from Homer to Statius. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1998).
15.
Duncan, K.: Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference. In: Roman poetry and propaganda in the age of Augustus. pp. 26–58. Bristol Classical Press, Bristol (1992).
16.
McGuire, D.T.: Textual Strategies and Political Suicide in Flavian Epic. Ramus. 18, 21–45 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048671X00003027.
17.
Glenn W, M.: Disiecti membra poetae: The rhetoric of dismemberment in Neronian poetry. In: Innovations of antiquity. pp. 391–419. Routledge, London (1992).
18.
Osgood, J.: Caesar’s legacy: civil war and the emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006).
19.
Paul, George M: Urbs capta. Sketch of an ancient literary motif. The Phoenix. 144–155 (1982). https://doi.org/10.2307/1087673.
20.
Scarry, E.: The body in pain: the making and unmaking of the world. Oxford University Press, New York (1985).
21.
Sontag, S.: Regarding the pain of others. Penguin Books, London (2004).
22.
Sullivan, J.P.: Literature and politics in the age of Nero. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1985).
23.
Ahl, F.: Lucan: an introduction. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1976).
24.
Bartsch, S.: Ideology in cold blood: a reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1997).
25.
Bexley, E.M.: Replacing Rome: Geographic and Political Centrality in Lucan’s Pharsalia. Classical Philology. 104, 459–475 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1086/650980.
26.
Coffee, N.: The commerce of war: exchange and social order in Latin epic. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2009).
27.
D’Alessandro Behr, F.: Feeling history: Lucan, stoicism, and the poetics of passion. Ohio State University Press, Columbus (2007).
28.
Day, H.J.M.: Lucan and the sublime: power, representation and aesthetic experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).
29.
Dinter, M.T.: Anatomizing Civil War: studies in Lucan’s epic technique. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2012).
30.
Elaine, F.: Arachnion, n. 3 - Fantham: The ambiguity of Virtus in Lucan’s Civil War and Statius’ Thebaid, http://www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num3/fantham.html.
31.
Fantham, E.: The angry poet and the angry gods : problems of theodicy in Lucan’s epic of defeat. Ancient anger: perspectives from Homer to Galen. Yale classical studies, 229–249 (2003).
32.
Feeney, D.C.: ‘Stat Magni Nominis Umbra.’ Lucan on the Greatness of Pompeius Magnus. The Classical Quarterly. 36, (1986). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800010685.
33.
George, David B: Lucan’s Caesar and Stoic οἰκείωσις. The Stoic fool. Transactions of the American Philological Association. 331–341 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/284175.
34.
George, D.B.: Lucan’s Cato and Stoic Attitudes to the Republic. Classical Antiquity. 10, 237–258 (1991). https://doi.org/10.2307/25010951.
35.
Griffin, M.: Clementia after Caesar: from Politics to Philosophy. Caesar against liberty?: perspectives on his autocracy. Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar, 157–182 (2003).
36.
Johnson, W.R.: Momentary monsters: Lucan and his heroes. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1987).
37.
Leigh, M.: Lucan: spectacle and engagement. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1997).
38.
LONG, A.: LUCAN AND MORAL LUCK. The Classical Quarterly. 57, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S000983880700016X.
39.
Lovatt, H.: Competing endings : re-reading the end of the Thebaid through Lucan. Ramus. 28, 126–151 (1999).
40.
Masters, J.: Poetry and civil war in Lucan’s Bellum civile.
41.
Morford, M.P.O.: The poet Lucan: studies in rhetorical epic. Blackwell, Oxford (1967).
42.
Nix, Sarah A.: Caesar as Jupiter in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Classical Journal. 103, 281–294 (2008).
43.
O’Gorman, E.: Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war. Hermathena. 117–131 (1995).
44.
O’Higgins, D.: Lucan as ‘Vates’. Classical Antiquity. 7, 208–226 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/25010888.
45.
Ormand, K.: Lucan’s ‘Auctor Vix Fidelis’. Classical Antiquity. 13, 38–55 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2307/25011004.
46.
Roller, M.B.: Ethical Contradiction and the Fractured Community in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Classical Antiquity. 15, 319–347 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/25011044.
47.
Rossi, A: The ‘Aeneid’ revisited: The journey of Pompey in Lucan’s ‘Pharsalia’. American Journal Of Philology. 121, 571–591 (2000).
48.
Saylor, C.: Lucan and Models of the Introduction. Mnemosyne. 52, 545–553 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1163/156852599323224626.
49.
Seo, J.M.: Exemplary traits: reading characterization in Roman poetry. Oxford University Press, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199734283.001.0001.
50.
Sklenar, R: Nihilistic Cosmology and Catonian Ethics in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. American Journal of Philology. 120, 281–296 (1999).
51.
Spencer, D.: Lucan’s Follies: Memory and Ruin in a Civil-war Landscape. Greece and Rome. 52, 46–69 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/gromej/cxi008.
52.
STOVER, T.: CATO AND THE INTENDED SCOPE OF LUCAN’S BELLUM CIVILE. The Classical Quarterly. 58, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838808000645.
53.
Tesoriero, C., Muecke, F., Neal, T.: Lucan. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
54.
Brian, W.: Reading Death and the Senses in Lucan and Lucretius. In: Synaesthesia and the ancient senses. pp. 115–125. Acumen, Durham (2013).
55.
Willis, I.: Now and Rome: Lucan and Vergil as theorists of politics and space. Continuum, London (2011).
56.
Ash, R.: Ordering anarchy: armies and leaders in Tacitus’ Histories. Duckworth, London (1999).
57.
Rhiannon, A.: Fission and fusion: shifting Roman identities in the Histories. In: The Cambridge companion to Tacitus. pp. 85–99. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
58.
Rhiannon, A.: Tarda Moles Ciuilis Belli: The Weight of the Past in Tacitus’ Histories’ in Brian Breed. In: Citizens of discord: Rome and its civil wars. pp. 119–131. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
59.
Anthony R. Birley: The Life and Death of Cornelius Tacitus. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 230–247 (2000).
60.
CHARLES, M.B., ANAGNOSTOU-LAOUTIDES, E.: Unmanning an emperor: Otho in the literary tradition. The Classical journal. 109, 199–222 (2014).
61.
FRASER, C.B.: OTHO’S FUNNY WALK: TACITUS, HISTORIES 1.27. The Classical Quarterly. 57, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838807000596.
62.
Gibson, Bruce John: Rumours as causes of events in Tacitus. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici. 111–129 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/40236120.
63.
Haynes, H.: The history of make-believe: Tacitus on imperial Rome. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif (2003).
64.
Henderson, J.: Tacitus/The World in Pieces. Ramus. 18, 167–210 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048671X00003088.
65.
Timothy, J.: Repetita bellorum civilium memoria: the remembrance of civil war and its literature in Tacitus, Histories 1.50’. In: Time and narrative in ancient historiography: the ‘plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian. pp. 156–174. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
66.
Joseph, T.A.: Tacitus, the epic successor: Virgil, Lucan, and the narrative of civil war in the Histories. Brill, Leiden (2012).
67.
Keitel, E.: Otho’s Exhortations in Tacitus’ Histories. Greece and Rome. 34, 73–82 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500027716.
68.
Keitel, E: ‘Sententia’ and structure in Tacitus ‘Histories 1.12-49’. Arethusa. 39, 219–244 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2006.0014.
69.
Leeman, A.D.: Structure and meaning in the prologues of Tacitus. Studies in Latin language and literature. Yale classical studies, 169–208 (1973).
70.
David, L.: Tacitus’ Histories and the theory of deliberative oratory. In: The limits of historiography: genre and narrative in ancient historical texts. pp. 197–216. Brill, Leiden (1999).
71.
David, L.: Speeches in the Histories. In: The Cambridge companion to Tacitus. pp. 212–224. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
72.
Marincola, J.M.: Tacitus’ prefaces and the decline of imperial historiography. Latomus. 58, 391–404 (1999).
73.
Miller, N.P.: Tacitus’ Narrative Technique. Greece and Rome. 24, 13–22 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500019574.
74.
Morgan, G.: 69 A.D.: the year of four emperors. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006).
75.
O’Gorman, E.: Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war. Hermathena. 117–131 (1995).
76.
Pagán, V.E.: A companion to Tacitus. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (2012).
77.
Perkins, C.A.: Tacitus on Otho. Latomus. 52, 848–855 (1993).
78.
Plass, P.: Wit and the writing of history: the rhetoric of historiography in Imperial Rome. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison (1988).
79.
Pomeroy, Aj: Theatricality in Tacitus’s ‘Histories’. Arethusa. 39, 171–191 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2006.0018.
80.
Sailor, D.: Writing and empire in Tacitus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482366.
81.
Sinclair, P.: Tacitus the sententious historian: a sociology of rhetoric in Annales 1-6. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Penn (1995).
82.
Syme, R.: Tacitus: Vol.1. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1958).
83.
Syme, R.: Tacitus: Vol.2. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1958).
84.
Walker, B.: A Study in Incoherence: The First Book of Tacitus’ Histories. Classical Philology. 71, 113–118 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1086/366241.
85.
Woodman, A.J., Cambridge Collections Online (Online service): The Cambridge companion to Tacitus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).