Ahl, F. (1976). Lucan: an introduction: Vol. Cornell studies in classical philology. Cornell University Press.
Ando, C. (2000). Imperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman Empire: Vol. Classics and contemporary thought. University of California Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pp8t9
Anthony R. Birley. (2000). The Life and Death of Cornelius Tacitus. Historia: Zeitschrift Für Alte Geschichte, 230–247. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4436577?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Ash, R. (1999). Ordering anarchy: armies and leaders in Tacitus’ Histories. Duckworth.
Bannon, C. J. (1997). The brothers of Romulus: fraternal pietas in Roman law, literature, and society. Princeton University Press.
Bartsch, S. (1997). Ideology in cold blood: a reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Harvard University Press.
Bexley, E. M. (2009). Replacing Rome: Geographic and Political Centrality in Lucan’s Pharsalia. Classical Philology, 104(4), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1086/650980
Boyle, A. J. (1990). The Imperial muse: Ramus essays on Roman literature of the Empire : Flavian Epicist to Claudian. Aureal Publications.
Breed, B. W., Damon, C., & Rossi, A. (2010). Citizens of discord: Rome and its civil wars. Oxford University Press.
Brian, W. (2013). Reading Death and the Senses in Lucan and Lucretius. In Synaesthesia and the ancient senses: Vol. The senses in antiquity (pp. 115–125). Acumen.
Cairns, F., Fantham, E., & Langford Latin Seminar. (2003). Caesar against liberty?: perspectives on his autocracy: Vol. Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Francis Cairns.
CHARLES, M. B., & ANAGNOSTOU-LAOUTIDES, E. (2014). Unmanning an emperor: Otho in the literary tradition. The Classical Journal, 109(2), 199–222.
Coffee, N. (2009). The commerce of war: exchange and social order in Latin epic. University of Chicago Press.
D’Alessandro Behr, F. (2007). Feeling history: Lucan, stoicism, and the poetics of passion. Ohio State University Press.
David, L. (1999). Tacitus’ Histories and the theory of deliberative oratory. In The limits of historiography: genre and narrative in ancient historical texts: Vol. Mnemosyne (pp. 197–216). Brill.
David, L. (2010). Speeches in the Histories. In The Cambridge companion to Tacitus: Vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics (pp. 212–224). Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
Day, H. J. M. (2013). Lucan and the sublime: power, representation and aesthetic experience: Vol. Cambridge classical studies. Cambridge University Press. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781107305656
Dinter, M. T. (2012). Anatomizing Civil War: studies in Lucan’s epic technique. University of Michigan Press.
Duncan, K. (1992). Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference. In Roman poetry and propaganda in the age of Augustus (pp. 26–58). Bristol Classical Press.
Elaine, F. (n.d.). Arachnion, n. 3 - Fantham: The ambiguity of Virtus in Lucan’s Civil War and Statius’ Thebaid. http://www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num3/fantham.html
Fantham, E. (2003). The angry poet and the angry gods : problems of theodicy in Lucan’s epic of defeat. Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen, Yale classical studies, 229–249.
Feeney, D. C. (1986). ‘Stat Magni Nominis Umbra.’ Lucan on the Greatness of Pompeius Magnus. The Classical Quarterly, 36(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800010685
FRASER, C. B. (2007). OTHO’S FUNNY WALK: TACITUS, HISTORIES 1.27. The Classical Quarterly, 57(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838807000596
George, D. B. (1991). Lucan’s Cato and Stoic Attitudes to the Republic. Classical Antiquity, 10(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.2307/25010951
George, David B. (1988). Lucan’s Caesar and Stoic οἰκείωσις. The Stoic fool. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 331–341. https://doi.org/10.2307/284175
Gibson, Bruce John. (1998). Rumours as causes of events in Tacitus. Materiali e Discussioni per l’analisi Dei Testi Classici, 111–129. https://doi.org/10.2307/40236120
Glenn W, M. (1992). Disiecti membra poetae: The rhetoric of dismemberment in Neronian poetry. In Innovations of antiquity: Vol. New ancient world (pp. 391–419). Routledge.
Griffin, M. (1986). Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: II. Greece and Rome, 33(02), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500030357
Griffin, M. (2003). Clementia after Caesar: from Politics to Philosophy. Caesar against Liberty?: Perspectives on His Autocracy, Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar, 157–182.
Griffin, Miriam T. (1986). Philosophy, Cato, and Roman suicide. Greece and Rome, 64–77. http://www.jstor.org/stable/643026
Gunderson, E. (1996). The Ideology of the Arena. Classical Antiquity, 15(1), 113–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/25011033
Gurval, R. A. (1995). Actium and Augustus: the politics and emotions of civil war. University of Michigan Press.
Hallett, J. P. (1977). Perusinae glandes and the changing image of Augustus. American Journal of Ancient History, 2, 151–171.
Hardie, P. R. (1993). The epic successors of Virgil: a study in the dynamics of a tradition: Vol. Roman literature and its contexts. Cambridge University Press.
Haynes, H. (2003). The history of make-believe: Tacitus on imperial Rome: Vol. The Joan Palevsky imprint in classical literature. University of California Press.
Henderson, J. (1989). Tacitus/The World in Pieces. Ramus, 18(1–2), 167–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048671X00003088
Henderson, J. (1998). Fighting for Rome: poets and Caesars, history and civil war. Cambridge University Press.
Hershkowitz, D. (1998). The madness of epic: reading insanity from Homer to Statius: Vol. Oxford classical monographs. Clarendon Press.
Johnson, W. R. (1987). Momentary monsters: Lucan and his heroes: Vol. Cornell studies in classical philology. Cornell University Press.
Joseph, T. A. (2012). Tacitus, the epic successor: Virgil, Lucan, and the narrative of civil war in the Histories: Vol. Mnemosyne supplements. Brill. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9789004231283
Keitel, E. (1987). Otho’s Exhortations in Tacitus’ Histories. Greece and Rome, 34(01), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500027716
Keitel, E. (2006). ‘Sententia’ and structure in Tacitus ‘Histories 1.12-49’. Arethusa, 39(2), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2006.0014
Leeman, A. D. (1973). Structure and meaning in the prologues of Tacitus. Studies in Latin Language and Literature, Yale classical studies, 169–208.
Leigh, M. (1997). Lucan: spectacle and engagement: Vol. Oxford classical monographs. Clarendon Press.
LONG, A. (2007). LUCAN AND MORAL LUCK. The Classical Quarterly, 57(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S000983880700016X
Lovatt, H. (1999). Competing endings : re-reading the end of the Thebaid through Lucan. Ramus, 28(2), 126–151.
Marincola, J. M. (1999). Tacitus’ prefaces and the decline of imperial historiography. Latomus, 58(2), 391–404.
Masters, J. (n.d.). Poetry and civil war in Lucan’s Bellum civile: Vol. Cambridge classical studies (Cambridge).
McGuire, D. T. (1989). Textual Strategies and Political Suicide in Flavian Epic. Ramus, 18(1–2), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048671X00003027
Miller, N. P. (1977). Tacitus’ Narrative Technique. Greece and Rome, 24(01), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500019574
Morford, M. P. O. (1967). The poet Lucan: studies in rhetorical epic. Blackwell.
Morgan, G. (2006). 69 A.D.: the year of four emperors. Oxford University Press.
Nix, Sarah A. (2008). Caesar as Jupiter in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Classical Journal, 103(3), 281–294. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30037963
O’Gorman, E. (1995a). Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war. Hermathena, 158, 117–131.
O’Gorman, E. (1995b). Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war. Hermathena, 158, 117–131.
O’Higgins, D. (1988). Lucan as ‘Vates’. Classical Antiquity, 7(2), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/25010888
Ormand, K. (1994). Lucan’s ‘Auctor Vix Fidelis’. Classical Antiquity, 13(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/25011004
Osgood, J. (2006). Caesar’s legacy: civil war and the emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge University Press.
Pagán, V. E. (2012). A companion to Tacitus: Vol. Blackwell companions to the ancient world. Wiley-Blackwell. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781444354188
Paul, George M. (1982). Urbs capta. Sketch of an ancient literary motif. The Phoenix, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/1087673
Perkins, C. A. (1993). Tacitus on Otho. Latomus, 52, 848–855.
Philip, H. (2010). Crowds and Leaders in Imperial Historiography and Epic. In Latin historiography and poetry in the early empire: generic interactions: Vol. Mnemosyne supplements (pp. 9–27). Brill. http://pmt-eu.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg485432740&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg485432740&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&mode=Basic&vid=44BU_VU1&tab=tab2&vl(freeText0)=Latin%20Historiography%20and%20Poetry%20in%20the%20Early%20Empire%3A%20Generic%20Interactions%2C%20Leiden&dstmp=1497275531829&tabs=viewOnlineTab&gathStatTab=true
Plass, P. (1988). Wit and the writing of history: the rhetoric of historiography in Imperial Rome: Vol. Wisconsin studies in classics. University of Wisconsin Press.
Pomeroy, Aj. (2006). Theatricality in Tacitus’s ‘Histories’. Arethusa, 39(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2006.0018
Rhiannon, A. (2010a). Fission and fusion: shifting Roman identities in the Histories. In The Cambridge companion to Tacitus: Vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics (pp. 85–99). Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
Rhiannon, A. (2010b). Tarda Moles Ciuilis Belli: The Weight of the Past in Tacitus’ Histories’ in Brian Breed. In Citizens of discord: Rome and its civil wars (pp. 119–131). Oxford University Press.
Roller, M. B. (1996). Ethical Contradiction and the Fractured Community in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Classical Antiquity, 15(2), 319–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/25011044
Rossi, A. (2000). The ‘Aeneid’ revisited: The journey of Pompey in Lucan’s ‘Pharsalia’. American Journal Of Philology, 121(4), 571–591. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561727?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Sailor, D. (2008). Writing and empire in Tacitus. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482366
Saylor, C. (1999). Lucan and Models of the Introduction. Mnemosyne, 52(5), 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852599323224626
Scarry, E. (1985). The body in pain: the making and unmaking of the world. Oxford University Press.
Seo, J. M. (2013). Exemplary traits: reading characterization in Roman poetry. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199734283.001.0001
Sinclair, P. (1995). Tacitus the sententious historian: a sociology of rhetoric in Annales 1-6. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Sklenar, R. (1999). Nihilistic Cosmology and Catonian Ethics in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. American Journal of Philology, 120(2), 281–296. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561868
Sontag, S. (2004). Regarding the pain of others. Penguin Books.
Spencer, D. (2005). Lucan’s Follies: Memory and Ruin in a Civil-war Landscape. Greece and Rome, 52(1), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/gromej/cxi008
STOVER, T. (2008). CATO AND THE INTENDED SCOPE OF LUCAN’S BELLUM CIVILE. The Classical Quarterly, 58(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838808000645
Sullivan, J. P. (1985). Literature and politics in the age of Nero. Cornell University Press.
Syme, R. (1958a). Tacitus: Vol.1. Clarendon Press.
Syme, R. (1958b). Tacitus: Vol.2. Clarendon Press.
Tesoriero, C., Muecke, F., & Neal, T. (2010). Lucan: Vol. Oxford readings in classical studies. Oxford University Press.
Timothy, J. (2012). Repetita bellorum civilium memoria: the remembrance of civil war and its literature in Tacitus, Histories 1.50’. In Time and narrative in ancient historiography: the ‘plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian (pp. 156–174). Cambridge University Press.
Walker, B. (1976). A Study in Incoherence: The First Book of Tacitus’ Histories. Classical Philology, 71(1), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1086/366241
Willis, I. (2011). Now and Rome: Lucan and Vergil as theorists of politics and space. Continuum.
Woodman, A. J. & Cambridge Collections Online (Online service). (2010). The Cambridge companion to Tacitus: Vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
