Ahl, Frederick. 1976. Lucan: An Introduction. Vol. Cornell studies in classical philology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ando, Clifford. 2000. Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Vol. Classics and contemporary thought. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pp8t9.
Anthony R. Birley. 2000. ‘The Life and Death of Cornelius Tacitus’. Historia: Zeitschrift Für Alte Geschichte, 230–47. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4436577?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Ash, Rhiannon. 1999. Ordering Anarchy: Armies and Leaders in Tacitus’ Histories. London: Duckworth.
Bannon, Cynthia J. 1997. The Brothers of Romulus: Fraternal Pietas in Roman Law, Literature, and Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bartsch, Shadi. 1997. Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Bexley, Erica M. 2009. ‘Replacing Rome: Geographic and Political Centrality in Lucan’s Pharsalia’. Classical Philology 104 (4): 459–75. https://doi.org/10.1086/650980.
Boyle, Anthony James. 1990. The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire : Flavian Epicist to Claudian. Bendigo, Vic., Australia: Aureal Publications.
Breed, Brian W., Cynthia Damon, and Andreola Rossi. 2010. Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brian, Walters. 2013. ‘Reading Death and the Senses in Lucan and Lucretius’. In Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses, The senses in antiquity:115–25. Durham: Acumen.
Cairns, Francis, Elaine Fantham, and Langford Latin Seminar. 2003. Caesar against Liberty?: Perspectives on His Autocracy. Vol. Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Cambridge: Francis Cairns.
CHARLES, MICHAEL B., and EVA ANAGNOSTOU-LAOUTIDES. 2014. ‘Unmanning an Emperor: Otho in the Literary Tradition’. The Classical Journal 109 (2): 199–222.
Coffee, Neil. 2009. The Commerce of War: Exchange and Social Order in Latin Epic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
D’Alessandro Behr, Francesca. 2007. Feeling History: Lucan, Stoicism, and the Poetics of Passion. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
David, Levene. 1999. ‘Tacitus’ Histories and the Theory of Deliberative Oratory’. In The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts, Mnemosyne:197–216. Leiden: Brill.
———. 2010. ‘Speeches in the Histories’. In The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus, The Cambridge companions to literature and classics:212–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601.
Day, Henry J. M. 2013. Lucan and the Sublime: Power, Representation and Aesthetic Experience. Vol. Cambridge classical studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781107305656.
Dinter, Martin T. 2012. Anatomizing Civil War: Studies in Lucan’s Epic Technique. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Duncan, Kennedy. 1992. ‘Augustan’ and “Anti-Augustan”: Reflections on Terms of Reference’. In Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, 26–58. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.
Elaine, Fantham. n.d. ‘Arachnion, n. 3 - Fantham: The Ambiguity of Virtus in Lucan’s Civil War and Statius’ Thebaid’. http://www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num3/fantham.html.
Fantham, Elaine. 2003. ‘The Angry Poet and the Angry Gods : Problems of Theodicy in Lucan’s Epic of Defeat’. Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen Yale classical studies: 229–49.
Feeney, D. C. 1986. ‘“Stat Magni Nominis Umbra.” Lucan on the Greatness of Pompeius Magnus’. The Classical Quarterly 36 (01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800010685.
FRASER, CORA BETH. 2007. ‘OTHO’S FUNNY WALK: TACITUS, HISTORIES 1.27’. The Classical Quarterly 57 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838807000596.
George, David B. 1988. ‘Lucan’s Caesar and Stoic Οἰκείωσις. The Stoic Fool’. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 331–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/284175.
George, David B. 1991. ‘Lucan’s Cato and Stoic Attitudes to the Republic’. Classical Antiquity 10 (2): 237–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/25010951.
Gibson, Bruce John. 1998. ‘Rumours as Causes of Events in Tacitus’. Materiali e Discussioni per l’analisi Dei Testi Classici, 111–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/40236120.
Glenn W, Most. 1992. ‘Disiecti Membra Poetae: The Rhetoric of Dismemberment in Neronian Poetry’. In Innovations of Antiquity, New ancient world:391–419. London: Routledge.
Griffin, Miriam. 1986. ‘Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: II’. Greece and Rome 33 (02): 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500030357.
———. 2003. ‘Clementia after Caesar: From Politics to Philosophy’. Caesar against Liberty?: Perspectives on His Autocracy Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar: 157–82.
Griffin, Miriam T. 1986. ‘Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide’. Greece and Rome, 64–77. http://www.jstor.org/stable/643026.
Gunderson, Erik. 1996. ‘The Ideology of the Arena’. Classical Antiquity 15 (1): 113–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/25011033.
Gurval, Robert Alan. 1995. Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hallett, Judith P. 1977. ‘Perusinae Glandes and the Changing Image of Augustus’. American Journal of Ancient History 2: 151–71.
Hardie, Philip R. 1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Vol. Roman literature and its contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haynes, Holly. 2003. The History of Make-Believe: Tacitus on Imperial Rome. Vol. The Joan Palevsky imprint in classical literature. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
Henderson, John. 1989. ‘Tacitus/The World in Pieces’. Ramus 18 (1–2): 167–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048671X00003088.
———. 1998. Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hershkowitz, Debra. 1998. The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Statius. Vol. Oxford classical monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Johnson, W. R. 1987. Momentary Monsters: Lucan and His Heroes. Vol. Cornell studies in classical philology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Joseph, Timothy A. 2012. Tacitus, the Epic Successor: Virgil, Lucan, and the Narrative of Civil War in the Histories. Vol. Mnemosyne supplements. Leiden: Brill. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9789004231283.
Keitel, E. 2006. ‘“Sententia” and Structure in Tacitus “Histories 1.12-49”’. Arethusa 39 (2): 219–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2006.0014.
Keitel, Elizabeth. 1987. ‘Otho’s Exhortations in Tacitus’ Histories’. Greece and Rome 34 (01): 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500027716.
Leeman, Anton D. 1973. ‘Structure and Meaning in the Prologues of Tacitus’. Studies in Latin Language and Literature Yale classical studies: 169–208.
Leigh, Matthew. 1997. Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. Vol. Oxford classical monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
LONG, ALEX. 2007. ‘LUCAN AND MORAL LUCK’. The Classical Quarterly 57 (01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S000983880700016X.
Lovatt, Helen. 1999. ‘Competing Endings : Re-Reading the End of the Thebaid through Lucan’. Ramus 28 (2): 126–51.
Marincola, John M. 1999. ‘Tacitus’ Prefaces and the Decline of Imperial Historiography’. Latomus 58 (2): 391–404.
Masters, Jamie. n.d. Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. Cambridge. Vol. Cambridge classical studies.
McGuire, Donald T. 1989. ‘Textual Strategies and Political Suicide in Flavian Epic’. Ramus 18 (1–2): 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048671X00003027.
Miller, N. P. 1977. ‘Tacitus’ Narrative Technique’. Greece and Rome 24 (01): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500019574.
Morford, Mark P. O. 1967. The Poet Lucan: Studies in Rhetorical Epic. Oxford: Blackwell.
Morgan, Gwyn. 2006. 69 A.D.: The Year of Four Emperors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nix, Sarah A. 2008. ‘Caesar as Jupiter in Lucan’s “Bellum Civile”’. Classical Journal 103 (3): 281–94. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30037963.
O’Gorman, Ellen. 1995a. ‘Shifting Ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the Landscape of Civil War’. Hermathena, no. 158: 117–31.
———. 1995b. ‘Shifting Ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the Landscape of Civil War’. Hermathena, no. 158: 117–31.
O’Higgins, Dolores. 1988. ‘Lucan as “Vates”’. Classical Antiquity 7 (2): 208–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/25010888.
Ormand, Kirk. 1994. ‘Lucan’s “Auctor Vix Fidelis”’. Classical Antiquity 13 (1): 38–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/25011004.
Osgood, Josiah. 2006. Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pagán, Victoria Emma. 2012. A Companion to Tacitus. Vol. Blackwell companions to the ancient world. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781444354188.
Paul, George M. 1982. ‘Urbs Capta. Sketch of an Ancient Literary Motif’. The Phoenix, 144–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/1087673.
Perkins, C.A. 1993. ‘Tacitus on Otho’. Latomus 52: 848–55.
Philip, Hardie. 2010. ‘Crowds and Leaders in Imperial Historiography and Epic’. In Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions, Mnemosyne supplements:9–27. Leiden: Brill. http://pmt-eu.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg485432740&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg485432740&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&mode=Basic&vid=44BU_VU1&tab=tab2&vl(freeText0)=Latin%20Historiography%20and%20Poetry%20in%20the%20Early%20Empire%3A%20Generic%20Interactions%2C%20Leiden&dstmp=1497275531829&tabs=viewOnlineTab&gathStatTab=true.
Plass, Paul. 1988. Wit and the Writing of History: The Rhetoric of Historiography in Imperial Rome. Vol. Wisconsin studies in classics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Pomeroy, Aj. 2006. ‘Theatricality in Tacitus’s “Histories”’. Arethusa 39 (2): 171–91. https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2006.0018.
Rhiannon, Ash. 2010a. ‘Fission and Fusion: Shifting Roman Identities in the Histories’. In The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus, The Cambridge companions to literature and classics:85–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601.
———. 2010b. ‘Tarda Moles Ciuilis Belli: The Weight of the Past in Tacitus’ Histories’ in Brian Breed’. In Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars, 119–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roller, Matthew B. 1996. ‘Ethical Contradiction and the Fractured Community in Lucan’s “Bellum Civile”’. Classical Antiquity 15 (2): 319–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/25011044.
Rossi, A. 2000. ‘The “Aeneid” Revisited: The Journey of Pompey in Lucan’s “Pharsalia”’. American Journal Of Philology 121 (4): 571–91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561727?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Sailor, Dylan. 2008. Writing and Empire in Tacitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482366.
Saylor, Charles. 1999. ‘Lucan and Models of the Introduction’. Mnemosyne 52 (5): 545–53. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852599323224626.
Scarry, Elaine. 1985. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York: Oxford University Press.
Seo, Joanne Mira. 2013. Exemplary Traits: Reading Characterization in Roman Poetry. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199734283.001.0001.
Sinclair, Patrick. 1995. Tacitus the Sententious Historian: A Sociology of Rhetoric in Annales 1-6. University Park, Penn: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Sklenar, R. 1999. ‘Nihilistic Cosmology and Catonian Ethics in Lucan’s Bellum Civile’. American Journal of Philology 120 (2): 281–96. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561868.
Sontag, Susan. 2004. Regarding the Pain of Others. London: Penguin Books.
Spencer, D. 2005. ‘Lucan’s Follies: Memory and Ruin in a Civil-War Landscape’. Greece and Rome 52 (1): 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/gromej/cxi008.
STOVER, TIM. 2008. ‘CATO AND THE INTENDED SCOPE OF LUCAN’S BELLUM CIVILE’. The Classical Quarterly 58 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838808000645.
Sullivan, J. P. 1985. Literature and Politics in the Age of Nero. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Syme, Ronald. 1958a. Tacitus: Vol.1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1958b. Tacitus: Vol.2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tesoriero, Charles, Frances Muecke, and Tamara Neal. 2010. Lucan. Vol. Oxford readings in classical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Timothy, Joseph. 2012. ‘Repetita Bellorum Civilium Memoria: The Remembrance of Civil War and Its Literature in Tacitus, Histories 1.50’’. In Time and Narrative in Ancient Historiography: The ‘plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian, 156–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, B. 1976. ‘A Study in Incoherence: The First Book of Tacitus’ Histories’. Classical Philology 71 (1): 113–18. https://doi.org/10.1086/366241.
Willis, Ika. 2011. Now and Rome: Lucan and Vergil as Theorists of Politics and Space. London: Continuum.
Woodman, A. J. and Cambridge Collections Online (Online service). 2010. The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus. Vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601.
