Ahl, Frederick. 1976. Lucan: An Introduction. Cornell studies in classical philology. Cornell University Press.
Ando, Clifford. 2000. Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Classics and Contemporary thought. University of California Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pp8t9.
Anthony R. Birley. 2000. ‘The Life and Death of Cornelius Tacitus’. Historia: Zeitschrift Für Alte Geschichte, 230–47. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4436577?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Ash, Rhiannon. 1999. Ordering Anarchy: Armies and Leaders in Tacitus’ Histories. Duckworth.
Bannon, Cynthia J. 1997. The Brothers of Romulus: Fraternal Pietas in Roman Law, Literature, and Society. Princeton University Press.
Bartsch, Shadi. 1997. Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Harvard University Press.
Bexley, Erica M. 2009. ‘Replacing Rome: Geographic and Political Centrality in Lucan’s Pharsalia’. Classical Philology 104 (4): 459–75. https://doi.org/10.1086/650980.
Boyle, Anthony James. 1990. The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire : Flavian Epicist to Claudian. Aureal Publications.
Breed, Brian W., Cynthia Damon, and Andreola Rossi. 2010. Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford University Press.
Brian, Walters. 2013. ‘Reading Death and the Senses in Lucan and Lucretius’. In Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses, The senses in antiquity. Acumen.
Cairns, Francis, Elaine Fantham, and Langford Latin Seminar. 2003. Caesar against Liberty?: Perspectives on His Autocracy. Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Francis Cairns.
CHARLES, MICHAEL B., and EVA ANAGNOSTOU-LAOUTIDES. 2014. ‘Unmanning an Emperor: Otho in the Literary Tradition’. The Classical Journal (Greenville, S.C.) 109 (2): 199–222.
Coffee, Neil. 2009. The Commerce of War: Exchange and Social Order in Latin Epic. University of Chicago Press.
D’Alessandro Behr, Francesca. 2007. Feeling History: Lucan, Stoicism, and the Poetics of Passion. Ohio State University Press.
David, Levene. 1999. ‘Tacitus’ Histories and the Theory of Deliberative Oratory’. In The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts, Mnemosyne. Brill.
David, Levene. 2010. ‘Speeches in the Histories’. In The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus, The Cambridge companions to literature and classics. Cambridge University Press. Electronic resource. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601.
Day, Henry J. M. 2013. Lucan and the Sublime: Power, Representation and Aesthetic Experience. Cambridge classical studies. Cambridge University Press. Electronic resource. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781107305656.
Dinter, Martin T. 2012. Anatomizing Civil War: Studies in Lucan’s Epic Technique. University of Michigan Press.
Duncan, Kennedy. 1992. ‘Augustan’ and “Anti-Augustan”: Reflections on Terms of Reference’. In Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. Bristol Classical Press.
Elaine, Fantham. n.d. ‘Arachnion, n. 3 - Fantham: The Ambiguity of Virtus in Lucan’s Civil War and Statius’ Thebaid’. http://www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num3/fantham.html.
Fantham, Elaine. 2003. ‘The Angry Poet and the Angry Gods : Problems of Theodicy in Lucan’s Epic of Defeat’. Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen (Cambridge) Yale classical studies: 229–49.
Feeney, D. C. 1986. ‘“Stat Magni Nominis Umbra.” Lucan on the Greatness of Pompeius Magnus’. The Classical Quarterly 36 (01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800010685.
FRASER, CORA BETH. 2007. ‘OTHO’S FUNNY WALK: TACITUS, HISTORIES 1.27’. The Classical Quarterly 57 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838807000596.
George, David B. 1988. ‘Lucan’s Caesar and Stoic Οἰκείωσις. The Stoic Fool’. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 331–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/284175.
George, David B. 1991. ‘Lucan’s Cato and Stoic Attitudes to the Republic’. Classical Antiquity 10 (2): 237–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/25010951.
Gibson, Bruce John. 1998. ‘Rumours as Causes of Events in Tacitus’. Materiali e Discussioni per l’analisi Dei Testi Classici, 111–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/40236120.
Glenn W, Most. 1992. ‘Disiecti Membra Poetae: The Rhetoric of Dismemberment in Neronian Poetry’. In Innovations of Antiquity, New ancient world. Routledge.
Griffin, Miriam. 1986. ‘Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: II’. Greece and Rome 33 (02): 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500030357.
Griffin, Miriam. 2003. ‘Clementia after Caesar: From Politics to Philosophy’. Caesar against Liberty?: Perspectives on His Autocracy (Cambridge) Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar: 157–82.
Griffin, Miriam T. 1986. ‘Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide’. Greece and Rome, 64–77. http://www.jstor.org/stable/643026.
Gunderson, Erik. 1996. ‘The Ideology of the Arena’. Classical Antiquity 15 (1): 113–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/25011033.
Gurval, Robert Alan. 1995. Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War. University of Michigan Press.
Hallett, Judith P. 1977. ‘Perusinae Glandes and the Changing Image of Augustus’. American Journal of Ancient History (Cambridge, Mass) 2: 151–71.
Hardie, Philip R. 1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Roman literature and its Contexts. Cambridge University Press.
Haynes, Holly. 2003. The History of Make-Believe: Tacitus on Imperial Rome. The Joan Palevsky imprint in classical literature. University of California Press.
Henderson, John. 1989. ‘Tacitus/The World in Pieces’. Ramus 18 (1–2): 167–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048671X00003088.
Henderson, John. 1998. Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge University Press.
Hershkowitz, Debra. 1998. The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Statius. Oxford classical monographs. Clarendon Press.
Johnson, W. R. 1987. Momentary Monsters: Lucan and His Heroes. Cornell studies in classical philology. Cornell University Press.
Joseph, Timothy A. 2012. Tacitus, the Epic Successor: Virgil, Lucan, and the Narrative of Civil War in the Histories. Mnemosyne supplements. Brill. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9789004231283.
Keitel, E. 2006. ‘“Sententia” and Structure in Tacitus “Histories 1.12-49”’. Arethusa 39 (2): 219–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2006.0014.
Keitel, Elizabeth. 1987. ‘Otho’s Exhortations in Tacitus’ Histories’. Greece and Rome 34 (01): 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500027716.
Leeman, Anton D. 1973. ‘Structure and Meaning in the Prologues of Tacitus’. Studies in Latin Language and Literature (Cambridge) Yale classical studies: 169–208.
Leigh, Matthew. 1997. Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. Oxford classical monographs. Clarendon Press.
LONG, ALEX. 2007. ‘LUCAN AND MORAL LUCK’. The Classical Quarterly 57 (01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S000983880700016X.
Lovatt, Helen. 1999. ‘Competing Endings : Re-Reading the End of the Thebaid through Lucan’. Ramus (Berwick, Victoria) 28 (2): 126–51.
Marincola, John M. 1999. ‘Tacitus’ Prefaces and the Decline of Imperial Historiography’. Latomus (Brussels) 58 (2): 391–404.
Masters, Jamie. n.d. Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. Cambridge. Cambridge classical studies.
McGuire, Donald T. 1989. ‘Textual Strategies and Political Suicide in Flavian Epic’. Ramus 18 (1–2): 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048671X00003027.
Miller, N. P. 1977. ‘Tacitus’ Narrative Technique’. Greece and Rome 24 (01): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500019574.
Morford, Mark P. O. 1967. The Poet Lucan: Studies in Rhetorical Epic. Blackwell.
Morgan, Gwyn. 2006. 69 A.D.: The Year of Four Emperors. Oxford University Press.
Nix, Sarah A. 2008. ‘Caesar as Jupiter in Lucan’s “Bellum Civile”’. Classical Journal 103 (3): 281–94. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30037963.
O’Gorman, Ellen. 1995a. ‘Shifting Ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the Landscape of Civil War’. Hermathena (Dublin), no. 158: 117–31.
O’Gorman, Ellen. 1995b. ‘Shifting Ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the Landscape of Civil War’. Hermathena (Dublin), no. 158: 117–31.
O’Higgins, Dolores. 1988. ‘Lucan as “Vates”’. Classical Antiquity 7 (2): 208–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/25010888.
Ormand, Kirk. 1994. ‘Lucan’s “Auctor Vix Fidelis”’. Classical Antiquity 13 (1): 38–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/25011004.
Osgood, Josiah. 2006. Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge University Press.
Pagán, Victoria Emma. 2012. A Companion to Tacitus. Blackwell companions to the ancient world. Wiley-Blackwell. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781444354188.
Paul, George M. 1982. ‘Urbs Capta. Sketch of an Ancient Literary Motif’. The Phoenix, 144–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/1087673.
Perkins, C.A. 1993. ‘Tacitus on Otho’. Latomus (Brussels) 52: 848–55.
Philip, Hardie. 2010. ‘Crowds and Leaders in Imperial Historiography and Epic’. In Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions, Mnemosyne supplements. Brill. http://pmt-eu.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg485432740&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg485432740&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&mode=Basic&vid=44BU_VU1&tab=tab2&vl(freeText0)=Latin%20Historiography%20and%20Poetry%20in%20the%20Early%20Empire%3A%20Generic%20Interactions%2C%20Leiden&dstmp=1497275531829&tabs=viewOnlineTab&gathStatTab=true.
Plass, Paul. 1988. Wit and the Writing of History: The Rhetoric of Historiography in Imperial Rome. Wisconsin studies in classics. University of Wisconsin Press.
Pomeroy, Aj. 2006. ‘Theatricality in Tacitus’s “Histories”’. Arethusa 39 (2): 171–91. https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2006.0018.
Rhiannon, Ash. 2010a. ‘Fission and Fusion: Shifting Roman Identities in the Histories’. In The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus, The Cambridge companions to literature and classics. Cambridge University Press. Electronic resource. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601.
Rhiannon, Ash. 2010b. ‘Tarda Moles Ciuilis Belli: The Weight of the Past in Tacitus’ Histories’ in Brian Breed’. In Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford University Press.
Roller, Matthew B. 1996. ‘Ethical Contradiction and the Fractured Community in Lucan’s “Bellum Civile”’. Classical Antiquity 15 (2): 319–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/25011044.
Rossi, A. 2000. ‘The “Aeneid” Revisited: The Journey of Pompey in Lucan’s “Pharsalia”’. American Journal Of Philology 121 (4): 571–91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561727?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Sailor, Dylan. 2008. Writing and Empire in Tacitus. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482366.
Saylor, Charles. 1999. ‘Lucan and Models of the Introduction’. Mnemosyne 52 (5): 545–53. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852599323224626.
Scarry, Elaine. 1985. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford University Press.
Seo, Joanne Mira. 2013. Exemplary Traits: Reading Characterization in Roman Poetry. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199734283.001.0001.
Sinclair, Patrick. 1995. Tacitus the Sententious Historian: A Sociology of Rhetoric in Annales 1-6. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Sklenar, R. 1999. ‘Nihilistic Cosmology and Catonian Ethics in Lucan’s Bellum Civile’. American Journal of Philology 120 (2): 281–96. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561868.
Sontag, Susan. 2004. Regarding the Pain of Others. Penguin Books.
Spencer, D. 2005. ‘Lucan’s Follies: Memory and Ruin in a Civil-War Landscape’. Greece and Rome 52 (1): 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/gromej/cxi008.
STOVER, TIM. 2008. ‘CATO AND THE INTENDED SCOPE OF LUCAN’S BELLUM CIVILE’. The Classical Quarterly 58 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838808000645.
Sullivan, J. P. 1985. Literature and Politics in the Age of Nero. Cornell University Press.
Syme, Ronald. 1958a. Tacitus: Vol.1. Clarendon Press.
Syme, Ronald. 1958b. Tacitus: Vol.2. Clarendon Press.
Tesoriero, Charles, Frances Muecke, and Tamara Neal. 2010. Lucan. Oxford readings in classical studies. Oxford University Press.
Timothy, Joseph. 2012. ‘Repetita Bellorum Civilium Memoria: The Remembrance of Civil War and Its Literature in Tacitus, Histories 1.50’’. In Time and Narrative in Ancient Historiography: The ‘plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian. Cambridge University Press.
Walker, B. 1976. ‘A Study in Incoherence: The First Book of Tacitus’ Histories’. Classical Philology 71 (1): 113–18. https://doi.org/10.1086/366241.
Willis, Ika. 2011. Now and Rome: Lucan and Vergil as Theorists of Politics and Space. Continuum.
Woodman, A. J. and Cambridge Collections Online (Online service). 2010. The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus. The Cambridge companions to literature and Classics. Cambridge University Press. Electronic resource. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601.