1.
Ando C. Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Vol Classics and contemporary thought. University of California Press; 2000. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pp8t9
2.
Bannon CJ. The Brothers of Romulus: Fraternal Pietas in Roman Law, Literature, and Society. Princeton University Press; 1997.
3.
Boyle AJ. The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire : Flavian Epicist to Claudian. Aureal Publications; 1990.
4.
Breed BW, Damon C, Rossi A. Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford University Press; 2010.
5.
Cairns F, Fantham E, Langford Latin Seminar. Caesar against Liberty?: Perspectives on His Autocracy. Vol Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar. Francis Cairns; 2003.
6.
Griffin, Miriam T. Philosophy, Cato, and Roman suicide. Greece and Rome. Published online 1986:64-77. http://www.jstor.org/stable/643026
7.
Griffin M. Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: II. Greece and Rome. 1986;33(02):192-202. doi:10.1017/S0017383500030357
8.
Gunderson E. The Ideology of the Arena. Classical Antiquity. 1996;15(1):113-151. doi:10.2307/25011033
9.
Gurval RA. Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War. University of Michigan Press; 1995.
10.
Hallett JP. Perusinae glandes and the changing image of Augustus. American journal of ancient history. 1977;2:151-171.
11.
Hardie PR. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Vol Roman literature and its contexts. Cambridge University Press; 1993.
12.
Philip H. Crowds and Leaders in Imperial Historiography and Epic. In: Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions. Vol Mnemosyne supplements. Brill; 2010:9-27. http://pmt-eu.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg485432740&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg485432740&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&mode=Basic&vid=44BU_VU1&tab=tab2&vl(freeText0)=Latin%20Historiography%20and%20Poetry%20in%20the%20Early%20Empire%3A%20Generic%20Interactions%2C%20Leiden&dstmp=1497275531829&tabs=viewOnlineTab&gathStatTab=true
13.
Henderson J. Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge University Press; 1998.
14.
Hershkowitz D. The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Statius. Vol Oxford classical monographs. Clarendon Press; 1998.
15.
Duncan K. Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference. In: Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. Bristol Classical Press; 1992:26-58.
16.
McGuire DT. Textual Strategies and Political Suicide in Flavian Epic. Ramus. 1989;18(1-2):21-45. doi:10.1017/S0048671X00003027
17.
Glenn W M. Disiecti membra poetae: The rhetoric of dismemberment in Neronian poetry. In: Innovations of Antiquity. Vol New ancient world. Routledge; 1992:391-419.
18.
Osgood J. Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge University Press; 2006.
19.
Paul, George M. Urbs capta. Sketch of an ancient literary motif. The Phoenix. Published online 1982:144-155. doi:10.2307/1087673
20.
Scarry E. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford University Press; 1985.
21.
Sontag S. Regarding the Pain of Others. Penguin Books; 2004.
22.
Sullivan JP. Literature and Politics in the Age of Nero. Cornell University Press; 1985.
23.
Ahl F. Lucan: An Introduction. Vol Cornell studies in classical philology. Cornell University Press; 1976.
24.
Bartsch S. Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Harvard University Press; 1997.
25.
Bexley EM. Replacing Rome: Geographic and Political Centrality in Lucan’s Pharsalia. Classical Philology. 2009;104(4):459-475. doi:10.1086/650980
26.
Coffee N. The Commerce of War: Exchange and Social Order in Latin Epic. University of Chicago Press; 2009.
27.
D’Alessandro Behr F. Feeling History: Lucan, Stoicism, and the Poetics of Passion. Ohio State University Press; 2007.
28.
Day HJM. Lucan and the Sublime: Power, Representation and Aesthetic Experience. Vol Cambridge classical studies. Cambridge University Press; 2013. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781107305656
29.
Dinter MT. Anatomizing Civil War: Studies in Lucan’s Epic Technique. University of Michigan Press; 2012.
30.
Elaine F. Arachnion, n. 3 - Fantham: The ambiguity of Virtus in Lucan’s Civil War and Statius’ Thebaid. http://www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num3/fantham.html
31.
Fantham E. The angry poet and the angry gods : problems of theodicy in Lucan’s epic of defeat. Ancient anger: perspectives from Homer to Galen. 2003;Yale classical studies:229-249.
32.
Feeney DC. ‘Stat Magni Nominis Umbra.’ Lucan on the Greatness of Pompeius Magnus. The Classical Quarterly. 1986;36(01). doi:10.1017/S0009838800010685
33.
George, David B. Lucan’s Caesar and Stoic οἰκείωσις. The Stoic fool. Transactions of the American Philological Association. Published online 1988:331-341. doi:10.2307/284175
34.
George DB. Lucan’s Cato and Stoic Attitudes to the Republic. Classical Antiquity. 1991;10(2):237-258. doi:10.2307/25010951
35.
Griffin M. Clementia after Caesar: from Politics to Philosophy. Caesar against liberty?: perspectives on his autocracy. 2003;Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar:157-182.
36.
Johnson WR. Momentary Monsters: Lucan and His Heroes. Vol Cornell studies in classical philology. Cornell University Press; 1987.
37.
Leigh M. Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. Vol Oxford classical monographs. Clarendon Press; 1997.
38.
LONG A. LUCAN AND MORAL LUCK. The Classical Quarterly. 2007;57(01). doi:10.1017/S000983880700016X
39.
Lovatt H. Competing endings : re-reading the end of the Thebaid through Lucan. Ramus. 1999;28(2):126-151.
40.
Masters J. Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. Vol Cambridge classical studies. Cambridge.
41.
Morford MPO. The Poet Lucan: Studies in Rhetorical Epic. Blackwell; 1967.
42.
Nix, Sarah A. Caesar as Jupiter in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Classical Journal. 2008;103(3):281-294. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30037963
43.
O’Gorman E. Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war. Hermathena. 1995;(158):117-131.
44.
O’Higgins D. Lucan as ‘Vates’. Classical Antiquity. 1988;7(2):208-226. doi:10.2307/25010888
45.
Ormand K. Lucan’s ‘Auctor Vix Fidelis’. Classical Antiquity. 1994;13(1):38-55. doi:10.2307/25011004
46.
Roller MB. Ethical Contradiction and the Fractured Community in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Classical Antiquity. 1996;15(2):319-347. doi:10.2307/25011044
47.
Rossi, A. The ‘Aeneid’ revisited: The journey of Pompey in Lucan’s ‘Pharsalia’. American Journal Of Philology. 2000;121(4):571-591. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561727?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
48.
Saylor C. Lucan and Models of the Introduction. Mnemosyne. 1999;52(5):545-553. doi:10.1163/156852599323224626
49.
Seo JM. Exemplary Traits: Reading Characterization in Roman Poetry. Oxford University Press; 2013. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199734283.001.0001
50.
Sklenar, R. Nihilistic Cosmology and Catonian Ethics in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. American Journal of Philology. 1999;120(2):281-296. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561868
51.
Spencer D. Lucan’s Follies: Memory and Ruin in a Civil-war Landscape. Greece and Rome. 2005;52(1):46-69. doi:10.1093/gromej/cxi008
52.
STOVER T. CATO AND THE INTENDED SCOPE OF LUCAN’S BELLUM CIVILE. The Classical Quarterly. 2008;58(02). doi:10.1017/S0009838808000645
53.
Tesoriero C, Muecke F, Neal T. Lucan. Vol Oxford readings in classical studies. Oxford University Press; 2010.
54.
Brian W. Reading Death and the Senses in Lucan and Lucretius. In: Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses. Vol The senses in antiquity. Acumen; 2013:115-125.
55.
Willis I. Now and Rome: Lucan and Vergil as Theorists of Politics and Space. Continuum; 2011.
56.
Ash R. Ordering Anarchy: Armies and Leaders in Tacitus’ Histories. Duckworth; 1999.
57.
Rhiannon A. Fission and fusion: shifting Roman identities in the Histories. In: The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus. Vol The Cambridge companions to literature and classics. Cambridge University Press; 2010:85-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
58.
Rhiannon A. Tarda Moles Ciuilis Belli: The Weight of the Past in Tacitus’ Histories’ in Brian Breed. In: Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford University Press; 2010:119-131.
59.
Anthony R. Birley. The Life and Death of Cornelius Tacitus. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. Published online 2000:230-247. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4436577?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60.
CHARLES MB, ANAGNOSTOU-LAOUTIDES E. Unmanning an emperor: Otho in the literary tradition. The Classical journal. 2014;109(2):199-222.
61.
FRASER CB. OTHO’S FUNNY WALK: TACITUS, HISTORIES 1.27. The Classical Quarterly. 2007;57(02). doi:10.1017/S0009838807000596
62.
Gibson, Bruce John. Rumours as causes of events in Tacitus. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici. Published online 1998:111-129. doi:10.2307/40236120
63.
Haynes H. The History of Make-Believe: Tacitus on Imperial Rome. Vol The Joan Palevsky imprint in classical literature. University of California Press; 2003.
64.
Henderson J. Tacitus/The World in Pieces. Ramus. 1989;18(1-2):167-210. doi:10.1017/S0048671X00003088
65.
Timothy J. Repetita bellorum civilium memoria: the remembrance of civil war and its literature in Tacitus, Histories 1.50’. In: Time and Narrative in Ancient Historiography: The ‘plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian. Cambridge University Press; 2012:156-174.
66.
Joseph TA. Tacitus, the Epic Successor: Virgil, Lucan, and the Narrative of Civil War in the Histories. Vol Mnemosyne supplements. Brill; 2012. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9789004231283
67.
Keitel E. Otho’s Exhortations in Tacitus’ Histories. Greece and Rome. 1987;34(01):73-82. doi:10.1017/S0017383500027716
68.
Keitel, E. ‘Sententia’ and structure in Tacitus ‘Histories 1.12-49’. Arethusa. 2006;39(2):219-244. doi:10.1353/are.2006.0014
69.
Leeman AD. Structure and meaning in the prologues of Tacitus. Studies in Latin language and literature. 1973;Yale classical studies:169-208.
70.
David L. Tacitus’ Histories and the theory of deliberative oratory. In: The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts. Vol Mnemosyne. Brill; 1999:197-216.
71.
David L. Speeches in the Histories. In: The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus. Vol The Cambridge companions to literature and classics. Cambridge University Press; 2010:212-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
72.
Marincola JM. Tacitus’ prefaces and the decline of imperial historiography. Latomus. 1999;58(2):391-404.
73.
Miller NP. Tacitus’ Narrative Technique. Greece and Rome. 1977;24(01):13-22. doi:10.1017/S0017383500019574
74.
Morgan G. 69 A.D.: The Year of Four Emperors. Oxford University Press; 2006.
75.
O’Gorman E. Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war. Hermathena. 1995;(158):117-131.
76.
Pagán VE. A Companion to Tacitus. Vol Blackwell companions to the ancient world. Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781444354188
77.
Perkins CA. Tacitus on Otho. Latomus. 1993;52:848-855.
78.
Plass P. Wit and the Writing of History: The Rhetoric of Historiography in Imperial Rome. Vol Wisconsin studies in classics. University of Wisconsin Press; 1988.
79.
Pomeroy, Aj. Theatricality in Tacitus’s ‘Histories’. Arethusa. 2006;39(2):171-191. doi:10.1353/are.2006.0018
80.
Sailor D. Writing and Empire in Tacitus. Cambridge University Press; 2008. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511482366
81.
Sinclair P. Tacitus the Sententious Historian: A Sociology of Rhetoric in Annales 1-6. Pennsylvania State University Press; 1995.
82.
Syme R. Tacitus: Vol.1. Clarendon Press; 1958.
83.
Syme R. Tacitus: Vol.2. Clarendon Press; 1958.
84.
Walker B. A Study in Incoherence: The First Book of Tacitus’ Histories. Classical Philology. 1976;71(1):113-118. doi:10.1086/366241
85.
Woodman AJ, Cambridge Collections Online (Online service). The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus. Vol The Cambridge companions to literature and classics. Cambridge University Press; 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601