1.
Ando C. Imperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman Empire [Internet]. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 2000. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pp8t9
2.
Bannon CJ. The brothers of Romulus: fraternal pietas in Roman law, literature, and society. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1997.
3.
Boyle AJ. The Imperial muse: Ramus essays on Roman literature of the Empire : Flavian Epicist to Claudian. Bendigo, Vic., Australia: Aureal Publications; 1990.
4.
Breed BW, Damon C, Rossi A. Citizens of discord: Rome and its civil wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
5.
Cairns F, Fantham E, Langford Latin Seminar. Caesar against liberty?: perspectives on his autocracy. Cambridge: Francis Cairns; 2003.
6.
Griffin, Miriam T. Philosophy, Cato, and Roman suicide. Greece and Rome [Internet]. 1986;64–77. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/643026
7.
Griffin M. Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: II. Greece and Rome. 1986 Oct;33(02):192–202.
8.
Gunderson E. The Ideology of the Arena. Classical Antiquity. 1996 Apr;15(1):113–151.
9.
Gurval RA. Actium and Augustus: the politics and emotions of civil war. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1995.
10.
Hallett JP. Perusinae glandes and the changing image of Augustus. American journal of ancient history. Cambridge, Mass; 1977;2:151–171.
11.
Hardie PR. The epic successors of Virgil: a study in the dynamics of a tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
12.
Philip H. Crowds and Leaders in Imperial Historiography and Epic. Latin historiography and poetry in the early empire: generic interactions [Internet]. Leiden: Brill; 2010. p. 9–27. Available from: http://pmt-eu.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg485432740&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg485432740&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&mode=Basic&vid=44BU_VU1&tab=tab2&vl(freeText0)=Latin%20Historiography%20and%20Poetry%20in%20the%20Early%20Empire%3A%20Generic%20Interactions%2C%20Leiden&dstmp=1497275531829&tabs=viewOnlineTab&gathStatTab=true
13.
Henderson J. Fighting for Rome: poets and Caesars, history and civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
14.
Hershkowitz D. The madness of epic: reading insanity from Homer to Statius. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998.
15.
Duncan K. Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference. Roman poetry and propaganda in the age of Augustus. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press; 1992. p. 26–58.
16.
McGuire DT. Textual Strategies and Political Suicide in Flavian Epic. Ramus. 1989;18(1–2):21–45.
17.
Glenn W M. Disiecti membra poetae: The rhetoric of dismemberment in Neronian poetry. Innovations of antiquity. London: Routledge; 1992. p. 391–419.
18.
Osgood J. Caesar’s legacy: civil war and the emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
19.
Paul, George M. Urbs capta. Sketch of an ancient literary motif. The Phoenix. 1982;144–155.
20.
Scarry E. The body in pain: the making and unmaking of the world. New York: Oxford University Press; 1985.
21.
Sontag S. Regarding the pain of others. London: Penguin Books; 2004.
22.
Sullivan JP. Literature and politics in the age of Nero. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1985.
23.
Ahl F. Lucan: an introduction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1976.
24.
Bartsch S. Ideology in cold blood: a reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1997.
25.
Bexley EM. Replacing Rome: Geographic and Political Centrality in Lucan’s Pharsalia. Classical Philology. 2009 Oct;104(4):459–475.
26.
Coffee N. The commerce of war: exchange and social order in Latin epic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2009.
27.
D’Alessandro Behr F. Feeling history: Lucan, stoicism, and the poetics of passion. Columbus: Ohio State University Press; 2007.
28.
Day HJM. Lucan and the sublime: power, representation and aesthetic experience [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781107305656
29.
Dinter MT. Anatomizing Civil War: studies in Lucan’s epic technique. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2012.
30.
Elaine F. Arachnion, n. 3 - Fantham: The ambiguity of Virtus in Lucan’s Civil War and Statius’ Thebaid [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num3/fantham.html
31.
Fantham E. The angry poet and the angry gods : problems of theodicy in Lucan’s epic of defeat. Ancient anger: perspectives from Homer to Galen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003;Yale classical studies:229–249.
32.
Feeney DC. ‘Stat Magni Nominis Umbra.’ Lucan on the Greatness of Pompeius Magnus. The Classical Quarterly. 1986 May;36(01).
33.
George, David B. Lucan’s Caesar and Stoic οἰκείωσις. The Stoic fool. Transactions of the American Philological Association. 1988;331–341.
34.
George DB. Lucan’s Cato and Stoic Attitudes to the Republic. Classical Antiquity. 1991 Oct;10(2):237–258.
35.
Griffin M. Clementia after Caesar: from Politics to Philosophy. Caesar against liberty?: perspectives on his autocracy. Cambridge: Francis Cairns; 2003;Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar:157–182.
36.
Johnson WR. Momentary monsters: Lucan and his heroes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1987.
37.
Leigh M. Lucan: spectacle and engagement. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1997.
38.
LONG A. LUCAN AND MORAL LUCK. The Classical Quarterly. 2007 May;57(01).
39.
Lovatt H. Competing endings : re-reading the end of the Thebaid through Lucan. Ramus. Berwick, Victoria: Aureal Publications; 1999;28(2):126–151.
40.
Masters J. Poetry and civil war in Lucan’s Bellum civile. Cambridge.
41.
Morford MPO. The poet Lucan: studies in rhetorical epic. Oxford: Blackwell; 1967.
42.
Nix, Sarah A. Caesar as Jupiter in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Classical Journal [Internet]. 2008;103(3):281–294. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30037963
43.
O’Gorman E. Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war. Hermathena. Dublin: University of Dublin; 1995;(158):117–131.
44.
O’Higgins D. Lucan as ‘Vates’. Classical Antiquity. 1988 Oct;7(2):208–226.
45.
Ormand K. Lucan’s ‘Auctor Vix Fidelis’. Classical Antiquity. 1994 Apr;13(1):38–55.
46.
Roller MB. Ethical Contradiction and the Fractured Community in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Classical Antiquity. 1996 Oct;15(2):319–347.
47.
Rossi, A. The ‘Aeneid’ revisited: The journey of Pompey in Lucan’s ‘Pharsalia’. American Journal Of Philology [Internet]. 2000;121(4):571–591. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561727?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
48.
Saylor C. Lucan and Models of the Introduction. Mnemosyne. 1999 Oct 1;52(5):545–553.
49.
Seo JM. Exemplary traits: reading characterization in Roman poetry [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199734283.001.0001/acprof-9780199734283
50.
Sklenar, R. Nihilistic Cosmology and Catonian Ethics in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. American Journal of Philology [Internet]. 1999;120(2):281–296. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1561868
51.
Spencer D. Lucan’s Follies: Memory and Ruin in a Civil-war Landscape. Greece and Rome. 2005 Jan 1;52(1):46–69.
52.
STOVER T. CATO AND THE INTENDED SCOPE OF LUCAN’S BELLUM CIVILE. The Classical Quarterly. 2008 Dec;58(02).
53.
Tesoriero C, Muecke F, Neal T. Lucan. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
54.
Brian W. Reading Death and the Senses in Lucan and Lucretius. Synaesthesia and the ancient senses. Durham: Acumen; 2013. p. 115–125.
55.
Willis I. Now and Rome: Lucan and Vergil as theorists of politics and space. London: Continuum; 2011.
56.
Ash R. Ordering anarchy: armies and leaders in Tacitus’ Histories. London: Duckworth; 1999.
57.
Rhiannon A. Fission and fusion: shifting Roman identities in the Histories. The Cambridge companion to Tacitus [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 85–99. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
58.
Rhiannon A. Tarda Moles Ciuilis Belli: The Weight of the Past in Tacitus’ Histories’ in Brian Breed. Citizens of discord: Rome and its civil wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 119–131.
59.
Anthony R. Birley. The Life and Death of Cornelius Tacitus. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte [Internet]. Franz Steiner VerlagFranz Steiner Verlag; 2000;230–247. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4436577?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60.
CHARLES MB, ANAGNOSTOU-LAOUTIDES E. Unmanning an emperor: Otho in the literary tradition. The Classical journal. Greenville, S.C.: Classical Association of the Middle West and South; 2014;109(2):199–222.
61.
FRASER CB. OTHO’S FUNNY WALK: TACITUS, HISTORIES 1.27. The Classical Quarterly. 2007 Dec;57(02).
62.
Gibson, Bruce John. Rumours as causes of events in Tacitus. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici. 1998;111–129.
63.
Haynes H. The history of make-believe: Tacitus on imperial Rome. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 2003.
64.
Henderson J. Tacitus/The World in Pieces. Ramus. 1989;18(1–2):167–210.
65.
Timothy J. Repetita bellorum civilium memoria: the remembrance of civil war and its literature in Tacitus, Histories 1.50’. Time and narrative in ancient historiography: the ‘plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. p. 156–174.
66.
Joseph TA. Tacitus, the epic successor: Virgil, Lucan, and the narrative of civil war in the Histories [Internet]. Leiden: Brill; 2012. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9789004231283
67.
Keitel E. Otho’s Exhortations in Tacitus’ Histories. Greece and Rome. 1987 Apr;34(01):73–82.
68.
Keitel, E. ‘Sententia’ and structure in Tacitus ‘Histories 1.12-49’. Arethusa. 2006;39(2):219–244.
69.
Leeman AD. Structure and meaning in the prologues of Tacitus. Studies in Latin language and literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1973;Yale classical studies:169–208.
70.
David L. Tacitus’ Histories and the theory of deliberative oratory. The limits of historiography: genre and narrative in ancient historical texts. Leiden: Brill; 1999. p. 197–216.
71.
David L. Speeches in the Histories. The Cambridge companion to Tacitus [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 212–224. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
72.
Marincola JM. Tacitus’ prefaces and the decline of imperial historiography. Latomus. Brussels: Latomus; 1999;58(2):391–404.
73.
Miller NP. Tacitus’ Narrative Technique. Greece and Rome. 1977 Apr;24(01):13–22.
74.
Morgan G. 69 A.D.: the year of four emperors. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
75.
O’Gorman E. Shifting ground : Lucan, Tacitus and the landscape of civil war. Hermathena. Dublin: University of Dublin; 1995;(158):117–131.
76.
Pagán VE. A companion to Tacitus [Internet]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781444354188
77.
Perkins CA. Tacitus on Otho. Latomus. Brussels: Latomus; 1993;52:848–855.
78.
Plass P. Wit and the writing of history: the rhetoric of historiography in Imperial Rome. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; 1988.
79.
Pomeroy, Aj. Theatricality in Tacitus’s ‘Histories’. Arethusa. 2006;39(2):171–191.
80.
Sailor D. Writing and empire in Tacitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
81.
Sinclair P. Tacitus the sententious historian: a sociology of rhetoric in Annales 1-6. University Park, Penn: Pennsylvania State University Press; 1995.
82.
Syme R. Tacitus: Vol.1. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1958.
83.
Syme R. Tacitus: Vol.2. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1958.
84.
Walker B. A Study in Incoherence: The First Book of Tacitus’ Histories. Classical Philology. 1976 Jan;71(1):113–118.
85.
Woodman AJ, Cambridge Collections Online (Online service). The Cambridge companion to Tacitus [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521874601
